Thought to be bright, David Petraeus, shown in his official government photo as CIA director, did a not-so-bright thing by engaging in an extramarital affair with a much younger woman. It cost him his job and mounds of respect.
An affair makes
small a man who
once stood tall
Sunday, Nov. 25, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. — Random thoughts on a post-Thanksgiving Sunday ...
It’s a tale as old as time. A married man (substitute “woman,” if you please) rises to a high level of achievement, status or position within his career field, has an illicit affair with a PYT (pretty young thing), gets caught and has his world come crashing down on him.
Such is the case of David Petraeus, the retired four-star U.S. Army general, noted leader in the military campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan, former head of U.S. Central Command and, until a couple of weeks ago, America’s top spy as director of the Central Intelligence Agency.
As the news-watching world knows by now, Petraeus offered to President Obama his resignation from the CIA on Nov. 8, as the result of a federal investigation into his admitted extramarital affair with biographer Paula Broadwell, and Obama accepted the resignation the next day.
Oh, how quickly and how hard the high and mighty can fall as a result of poor judgment, indiscretion and unbridled lust.
While his friends and former military colleagues publicly back Petraeus, the respect that I had developed for him as a top general, military strategist, government leader and, really, a “man above men” is gone. Out the window. Finis.
There are several things I abhor, and near the top of the list is adultery. Short of murder, it’s the worst thing one spouse can do to the other.
Taste tale ironic
Sadly ironic is the matter of the head cold I’m currently battling.
It’s ironic because I wrote on Thanksgiving Day that I’m grateful not just for the big things in life but also for the little things. The things people often take for granted. Things like our senses.
Well, as a result of the cold and related sinus congestion, I’ve temporarily lost my senses of smell and taste. And that’s sad, because here at the Braddy house, we have a refrigerator full of leftovers from the Thanksgiving family feast, and for the past two days I’ve only been able to imagine that they taste great — because I can’t taste anything. (Thankfully, the cold wasn’t fully developed when the holiday rolled around.)
I was about to write that I would’ve gladly, but only temporarily, traded my sense of hearing for my senses of smell and taste, but had that been so, I wouldn’t have been able to enjoy and learn from the two great Sunday messages from my pastor.
Oh, well, maybe I’ll find relief from the cold tomorrow. The fridge is only slightly less full of leftovers now, and there remains a lot of great tasting ahead of me.
The Gators surprise
Perhaps because I’ve been super busy with a lot of different projects, I’ve followed the Florida Gators football program less this year than in any other year in recent memory.
Oh, I’ve watched the Gators play on television, but, unlike previous years, I haven’t been in front of the TV for every down. In fact, I’ve missed a couple of televised games.
But, I wasn’t going to let anything keep me away from Saturday’s Florida-Florida State game. As a big Florida fan for 34 years, you can imagine how happy I was that the Gators came away with convincing 37-26 road victory over the Seminoles.
With their offense struggling of late and their starting quarterback coming off an ankle injury, I didn’t expect the Gators to do well on the ‘Noles’ home turf. But, neither did I expect the Gators to finish the regular season with an 11-1 record (the lone loss coming in a most-critical conference game against Georgia).
As did many other people, I sold the Gators short this year, and for that I humbly apologize. I’ve never been so pleased to have been so wrong about one of my favorite sports teams.
At about this time last year, following an awful 6-6 UF regular season (awful by Florida standards), I wrote a column about the Gators and opined that perhaps then-first-year head coach Will Muschamp was out of his league at Florida and in the tough Southeastern Conference. Today, I would have to say that Muschamp has proven that he can coach in the SEC — and do it very well — and that he can be a very effective head Gator.
Here’s hoping that the Gators win their bowl game (it’s looking like it’ll be against Oklahoma in the lucrative Sugar Bowl in New Orleans), finish the season 12-1 and head into the key player-recruiting period on a very high note.
O give thanks
for things both
big and small
Thursday, Nov. 22, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. — Though greatly disturbed by the election results, the state of our nation and developments very close to home, I am thankful — on this Thanksgiving Day 2012 and every day — for the richness of God’s blessings upon me.
I am thankful for the big things — family, a job, plenty to eat, good health, a great church home, an excellent pastor and all the “stuff” of life — but I am thankful, too, for the little things, the things we often take for granted — things like our senses.
I am thankful for my sight, that I might see, day and night, the wonders of God’s creation.
I am thankful for my hearing, that I might hear the rustling of the wind through the trees, the preaching of God’s Word and the melodies of soothing music.
I am thankful for the sense of smell, that I might enjoy brewing coffee, blooming orange blossoms and grilling burgers.
I am thankful for taste, that I might distinguish cinnamon rolls from Texas toast, salmon from catfish, pork from beef and Coca-Cola from Mountain Dew.
And I am thankful for touch, that I might create things, type words on a computer, react to harmful elements and hold the tiny hand of my precious granddaughter.
Most of all, I am thankful for the God that gave me these senses, the God that has allowed me to keep these senses all the days of my life and the God that gave me the good sense to accept his free gift of salvation way back in 1969.
O give thanks unto the Lord, for he is good: for his mercy endureth for ever. — Psalm 107:1 (KJV)
A sad commentary
This message (dressed up with art here) was posted Wednesday (Nov. 7, 2012), the day following the U.S. presidential election, on the sign outside of Central Baptist Church at Avenue A and Sixth Street, N.W., in Winter Haven. It’s sad to consider, but, oh, so true. — JB (Nov. 9, 2012)
In these dark
days, God’s Word
Wednesday, Nov. 7, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. — As I sit at home, alone in my office, very early on this day after the election, and sadly contemplate another four years with Barack Hussein Obama as president of these once-great United States, I have to turn to the Bible for comfort.
And I have to understand and be satisfied that even under these circumstances — even with an immoral, Marxist and Islam-boosting man as the extended leader of this nation — the Lord God Almighty is in control. Of everything.
• Joshua 1:9 (KJV) — Have not I commanded thee? Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the Lord thy God is with thee whithersoever thou goest.
• Psalm 22:28 — For the kingdom is the Lord’s: and he is the governor among the nations.
• Psalm 46:10 — Be still, and know that I am God: I will be exalted among the heathen, I will be exalted in the earth.
• Matthew 6:34 — Take therefore no thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself. Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof.
• Psalm 115:3 — But our God is in the heavens: he hath done whatsoever he hath pleased.
• Proverbs 16:4 — The Lord hath made all things for himself: yea, even the wicked for the day of evil.
• Proverbs 11:21 — Though hand join in hand, the wicked shall not be unpunished: but the seed of the righteous shall be delivered.
• Romans 8:28 — And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose.
On nights like last night, on days like today, thank God we can find peace and assurance in His Word.
forced to explain
support for Dems
Tuesday, Nov. 6, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. — A couple of quick thoughts very early on Election
Day 2012, with the voting precincts set to open in just a matter of minutes:
God bless commentator Bill O’Reilly of “The O’Reilly Factor” on the Fox News Channel. The other night, he was holding to the fire the feet of a couple of black ministers, both of them big Democratic Party loyalists.
O’Reilly was trying to understand and trying to get the ministers to tell him why they would back a political party that runs so counter to the godly work they were called to do and to the messages about righteous living that they purportedly preach from the pulpit each Sunday.
To these particular ministers, the Democratic Party’s messages about “social justice” and “economic equality” trump the party’s nation-destroying socialist tendencies and support for truly immoral homosexuality, same-sex “marriage” and abortion on demand.
In other words, these ministers’ membership in and support for the Democratic Party and its candidates, such as one President Barack Hussein Obama, is mostly about money and government handouts, with no apparent concern about morality and how the party’s policies are tearing apart the nation’s black families and black communities.
The ministers are selling their souls and their pulpits for access to government and the wealth it can spread around.
On another topic, I heard a news blip last night about Charlie Crist, the former Republican Florida governor and current political free agent. Crist was highly critical of current Gov. Rick Scott for his refusal to extend the early voting period in Florida.
My thinking is that voting-eligible Floridians have had and will have today plenty of opportunities to cast a ballot for local, state and national offices and proposed new policies. We’ve had the eight-day early voting period and the chance to cast a mail-in or absentee ballot, and today we have the 12-hour voting period.
I’ve often thought this when people like Crist say there just aren’t enough opportunities and isn’t enough time to vote: “How did this nation survive for more than 200 years when voting was held on only ONE DAY!”
Romney must be
in debate tonight
Please see updates below, at column’s end.
Wednesday, Oct. 3, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. — Mitt Romney isn’t going to listen to anything I have to say, but if I could spend some time with the Republican presidential nominee and give him some advice ahead of tonight’s first debate with “The Cool One” and “Author of Hope and Change,” President Barack Hussein Obama, here’s what I would tell him:
“Governor, at the first moment of opportunity, turn to the president, look him squarely in the eyes and boldly say, ‘With all due respect to the office you hold, Sir, you and your administration have badly served America and the American people.’ ”
Then I would have Romney provide some examples of that awful leadership — from staggering and wasteful spending to job-killing business overregulation, from socialist Obamacare to support for immoral gay “marriage,” from cozying up to Islamists to giving key ally Israel the cold shoulder. There are so many examples Romney could list.
Finally, I would tell Romney that during the debate he must be strong, he must be bold, he must be aggressive and he must be confident. He needs to go over the heads of the media types and must address the nation — not the panelists — with his debate responses.
I’m hoping for a game-changing debate performance from Romney tonight. Heaven knows, his unfocused and undisciplined campaign needs it.
Debate follow-up (Thursday, Oct. 4, 2012): I heard bits and pieces of last night’s Obama-Romney “debate” (“debate” in quote marks because it really wasn’t one) but didn’t watch it as entertainment. But, it’s good to hear that many of the pundits seem to think that Romney did very well and that the president looked and sounded uncomfortable, that he seemed to be just coasting and sitting on his lead in the polls.
With that in mind, here’s some more advice for the Romney and his campaign team: President Obama will be coached to be much more dynamic and aggressive the next time out. Be prepared!
Oh, and other thing ... The next time Obama brings up in a debate forum how Romney plans to give a “tax break to the rich,” Romney should respond again the way he did last night, that nothing in his economic plan calls for a tax cut for upper-income earners. And then he should add this: “But even if I did want to do that, Mr. President, you need to be reminded that what others make doesn’t automatically belong to government. You didn’t earn it! It’s not your money!“
The U.S. is hurting
but, hey, the ‘pro’
NFL refs are back
Sunday, Sept. 30, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. — With all of the serious problems and issues facing our nation, it’s hard to believe how much time, energy, newspaper ink, broadcast air time and water-cooler talk was consumed with concern and frustration about incompetent officiating in the NFL.
On second thought, given the disappointing state of our society, it can be easy to believe.
Many times (Most of the time?) we’re a superficial people with superficial concerns, interests and endeavors.
The United States of America — the insolvent, socially unraveled, unwisely led and morally corrupt nation that it is — is going to Hell in a handbasket in a hurry, and the quality of officiating in the National Football League was at the top of our worry list?
Instead of hand wringing about replacement refs, the inexperienced ones the NFL owners started the season with in a labor dispute with the seasoned officials, we would’ve been better off with concern and action about:
• Our national debt, now at more than $16 trillion ($51,101 per citizen and $140,433 per taxpayer).
• Our federal budget deficit, which is expected to total $1.1 trillion for fiscal year 2012.
• Our public education system — poor and getting worse by the day.
• The communist monster called China and its growing power and influence throughout the world, including deepening entrenchment in U.S. business.
• The evil of Islam and the exponential rise of Muslim converts in the United States and other western nations.
• A presidential administration that’s sympathetic toward Muslims and less than supportive of Israel, our most key ally in the Middle East.
• The sinister government of Iran and its nuclear ambitions.
• The growing decadence (illicit sex, homosexuality, pornography, booze, drugs, gambling, gluttony, laziness, violence) in the United States and the societal problems it causes.
• The shift away from moral absolutes, led by a president who sees nothing wrong with gay "marriage."
• A weakening work ethic and a steadily rising entitlement mentality among Americans — a sense, belief or expectation that government owes us something.
• Class warfare, envy, materialism, jealousy and greed.
• The banishment of God and all things heavenly from our schools, government and other important institutions.
The list is long and could be longer, but no worries. The “pro” NFL officials, fresh off a Saturday (Sept. 29) vote to approve a new labor contract, are back for all of today’s NFL games, and for the superficial, all is right with the USA. All is right with the world.
(Pssst. Do you want to know the truth? Even with the return of regular NFL zebras, calls still will be blown. Infractions still will be missed or intentionally overlooked. And football games still will be affected for the worse.)
Obama ad calls
that’s hardly true
Monday, Sept. 24, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. — In an attempt to refute claims by the Romney-Ryan campaign that his administration plans to make a $716 billion “raid” on Medicare funds to pay for Obamacare, President Obama has released a political ad that quotes the “nonpartisan” AARP as saying the “raid” claims just aren’t true.
That’s amusing. AARP (formerly the American Association of Retired Persons) is about as “nonpartisan” as Debbie Wasserman Shultz, a congresswoman from Florida and chairman of the Democratic National Committee.
On almost every major issue affecting older Americans, from taxes to budget cuts, from Social Security to Medicare and Medicaid, AARP can be counted on to side with the liberal or Democrat position. AARP as an organization is not sympathetic in the slightest to Republicans and conservatives or to conservative causes.
About the only way that AARP is “nonpartisan” is the way it targets everyone age 50 years old and above, no matter what the political leanings might be, for membership, services and contributions.
Always politically active, AARP has been and continues to be the leading U.S. organization for older Americans — not just retirees — but there are conservative alternatives. An Internet search for “conservative alternatives to AARP” found several, including The Association of Mature American Citizens Inc. (AMAC), the American Seniors Association, Generation America, the United States Senior Association the 60 Plus Association and the Alliance for Retirement Prosperity.
AMAC touts itself as “THE leading conservative alternative to the AARP,” but who really knows. Just a quick glance at the AMAC website — http://amac.us/ — indicates that it, too, is politically active. And it was interesting to learn that the 60 Plus Association went after U.S. Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., earlier this year with a $1.1 million television ad buy.
If you’re in the age group targeted by AARP, just know that it’s not the only organization around for older Americans. For conservatives, there are other and perhaps much better choices — at least when it comes to the hot-button political, health and welfare issues of the day.
P.S. The claims by the Republican presidential ticket of Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan are more true than not. The Obama adminstration does plan to raid Medicare to the tune of $716 billion over 10 years to help pay for the astronomical costs of Obamacare.
Obama plainly says:
‘I actually believe
Wednesday, Sept. 19, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. — In the wake of the media frenzy over poorly constructed but mostly truthful comments Mitt Romney made during a fundraiser in May, out comes an audio recording that shows President Barack Hussein Obama for the socialist-Marxist-communist that he really is.
Romney, the Republican presidential nominee, told a fundraising crowd in Florida in the spring that his campaign would have to focus on the independent or undecided voters who haven’t made up their minds about the race for the White House. He said it wouldn’t make sense to try to target the 47 percent of voters that Obama can count on, describing those Americans as “dependent on government,” did not pay federal income taxes and “believe they are victims.”
Said Romney: “My job is not to worry about those people. I’ll never convince them they need to take personal responsibility and care for their lives.”
While he spoke in terms that didn’t come close to being politically correct, Romney spoke the truth. There’s a large and growing dependency class in America, and if they’re voting, they’re going to vote for Obama.
Why? Because Obama believes in big government. Why? Because Obama supports larger social programs and more of them. Why? Because Obama believes big-time in the redistribution of wealth.
Ten years before he was elected president, Obama came clean with a socialist philosophy that we on the right have known all along forms the core of his thinking, his politics, his policies and his priorities.
Recorded during a 1998 speech at Loyola University in Illinois, Obama said this:
“The trick is figuring out how do we structure government systems that pool resources and hence facilitate some (wealth) redistribution — because I actually believe in redistribution, at least at a certain level to make sure that everybody’s got a shot.”
That, my friend, makes the president a socialist, if not a Marxist-communist, and that’s a philosophy the United States can’t afford and can’t embody if it’s to remain strong and economically vibrant.
Oh, and a note to the president: Automatically, “everybody’s got a shot” already in this country. Why? Because this is the United States of America, the greatest land of opportunity there is.
A shooting star
gets the day off to
a wonderful start
Tuesday, Sept. 18, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. — For the first time in my life, or for the first time I can ever remember, I saw a shooting star.
It happened very early today, around 6:30 a.m., when I went outside for my daily morning prayer time. It was an exciting moment, a wonderful moment. Had I not looked up at the stars in exactly the right direction at exactly the right time, I would’ve missed it.
I’ve heard it said that you’re supposed to wish upon a falling or shooting star, so I did just that. I wished for more moral leadership in the White House. If that means a new administration with Republican Mitt Romney at the helm, then so be it — and all the better.
Dealing with the
Clinton are fools
Thursday, Sept. 13, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. — Following Tuesday attacks by Muslim mobs on U.S. interests in two North Africa nations, in particular the seemingly sophisticated and coordinated assault that left Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three other Americans dead at the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had this to say:
“Today, many Americans are asking — indeed, I asked myself — how could this happen? How could this happen in a country we helped liberate, in a city we helped save from destruction?”
The statement offers a perfect example of the naive, foolish, ignorant and even stupid way Clinton and the Obama administration she represents has been handling the so-called “freedom” movement in various Islamic countries.
The people in these countries wanted and fought for freedom from the dictators who ruled them for many years, but they certainly didn’t have the idea to replace these authoritarian governments with Western-style democracies. What’s happening now, after the fall of the dictators in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya, etc., is an insidious transition to another kind of authoritarianism — this one based on evil Islamic law and violent Islamic extremism.
Sympathetic toward Muslims, Arab governments and Islam itself, President Barack Hussein Obama and Clinton have thought that because we helped these “freedom” movements in some way that the United States would be looked upon favorably by those who achieved the upper hand. Why haven’t our leaders learned by now that Islamists will use the United States to their advantage and then, when we least expect it, kill a few Americans to please Allah, destroy U.S. facilities and saw off our collective head to achieve their wicked goals?
From Kabul to Baghdad, from Cairo to Tripoli to Tunis, the blood and treasure the United States has given to help oppressed Muslims will never be enough to gain their favor. They will always hate us. They will always look for excuses (like a movie that ridicules Islam’s prophet, Mohammed) and opportunities to storm our diplmomatic outposts, burn our flag, kill our people and undermine our national security and way of life.
Secretary of State Clinton should know by now that in the Muslim world she’s not dealing with rational people. She’s dealing with fanatics, anti-Americans, anti-Christians, anti-Jews and in many cases just barbarians. These people are raised from birth to hate Jews, to hate Israel, to hate Americans, to hate the West and even to hate other Muslims who aren’t of their particular sect. Frighteningly, the number of Muslims and number of Muslim communities are growing in the United States, and more Americans are getting sucked into their false religion.
Clinton and the president she works for are fools. Perhaps the violence in Libya, Cairo, Tunisia and other Arab nations will open their eyes to the truth — before more Americans are murdered and more U.S. consulates and embassies are overrun and burned.
a year old on 11th
anniversary of 9/11
Tuesday, Sept. 11, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. — Today is Sept. 11, 2012, already the 11th anniversary of that terrible day when Islamic terrorists used our own jetliners as weapons against Americans and American centers of finance and defense.
It’s also the first anniversary of the launch of this website — PolkCommentary.com.
This little plot of real estate on the World Wide Web is very much a labor of love. I’ve enjoyed writing for it, pulling together art for it and offering it as a home for opinion pieces from like-minded conservatives.
Just as I published a year ago today:
“The commentary that appears here will be, without shame or apology, conservative in content and tone. We are pro-America, pro-democracy, pro-liberty, pro-U.S. Constitution, pro-capitalism, pro-military, pro-family and pro-traditional values.
“We will praise and promote all the positive qualities that made the United States — founded without a doubt on Judeo-Christian principles — the best and most prosperous and most free nation on Earth.
“We will promote hard work; thrift; common sense; and personal, business and government responsibility.
“We will support a U.S. policy of peace through strength.
“And, also without shame or apology, we will lift up the Lord Jesus Christ as the light and savior of the world and promote the good news of His Gospel.”
In the weeks that follow, some social media elements will be added to PolkCommentary.com to help create a greater sense of community about the site, to better promote it and to help expand its reach. That should be prove to be a fun and interesting endeavor as well.
May God bless you, may our leaders seek His wisdom and guidance, and may He continue to keep His hand of protection on the United States of America — the land that we love.
Really now, who’s
surprised by Romney
Monday, Sept. 10, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. — It’s been amusing to watch members of the Obama-backing media fall all over themselves to make Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney look like a flip-flopper on the issue of Obamacare.
After Romney appeared in the Sunday (Sept. 9) airing of NBC-TV’s “Meet the Press” and said “I’m not getting rid of all health-care reform,” the liberal pundits went a-buzz-buzz-buzzing in “gotcha” mode and newspapers produced headlines to the tune of “Romney Budges on Health Law” and “Romney Makes Health Care U-Turn.”
Given the essential facts, neither headline is correct. While he addressed his own plans for health care in more detail on “Meet the Press,” Romney didn’t flip-flop and didn’t make a U-turn on Obamacare, the 2010 federal law named with derision after President Obama but formally called the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
The mantra of the Romney campaign, before and after his formal nomination at the Republican National Convention a couple of weeks ago, has been to “repeal and replace” Obamacare, which Romney sees as being expensive and unwieldy.
Tarnished media types included, people have focused on the ”repeal” part of the Romney slogan but not the “replace” part.
Romney has said many times that once elected, he would work to replace Obamacare with his own brand of national health-care reform. On “Meet the Press,” he talked more about what that brand would include, and it just so happens it would include what he calls the more popular and common-sense parts of Obamacare.
“I’m not getting rid of health-care reform,” Romney said. “Of course, there are a number of things that I like in health-care reform that I’m going to put in place.”
He said the components he likes include coverage for people with previous or existing medical conditions and new insurance marketplaces.
Did anyone — political friend or foe — really think that Romney, the father of major health-care reform in Massachusetts when he was governor there, would scrap Obamacare entirely and move on to other pressing issues without proposing an alternative health-care plan?
Many Obama supporters today are gleeful, thinking they have some flip-flop-like statements to use against Romney during the remainder of the presidential campaign. And a sizeable number of Romney supporters now are disheartened and even angry, wondering if they can trust the guy to be open and honest on health care and every other issue and a good conservative foil to the socialist Obama.
The facts — the truth — are these:
1. Romney has said he would “repeal and replace” Obamacare, not just repeal it.
2. Despite denials by his campaign staff, Romney is moving to the political center on major issues — like health-care and medical insurance coverage — to pick up support from centrists, moderates and independents. He banked right to win the GOP nomination and now is banking the other way to win the general election.
3. Romney is not a true-blue conservative! His stance on national health-care reform, his “Meet the Press” comments embracing some key elements of Obamacare, shouldn’t have taken anyone by surprise.
4. If you put your faith and trust in a politician, or even a political party or movement, sooner or later that faith and trust will be shattered.
Just what will the
president do — or
not do — for votes?
Monday, Sept. 10, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. — The front-page headline in the Sunday morning newspaper had this to report: “Obama makes hard push for Latino vote.”
The headline begs a few questions:
• Just how far will President Barack Hussein Obama go to get those votes and improve his chances for re-election?
• What goodies — at taxpayer expense — will the president promise to give away to buy those Latino votes?
• What federal laws will the president ignore or circumvent to “feel the love” from the Hispanic community?
The answer to each of these questions is the same: The president will do anything and everything to win favor with the Hispanics, the fastest-growing minority segment in the United States, and he’s already gotten off to a big start doing just that.
Recall that in June, the president issued by fiat a king-like decree — another executive order — that his adminstration will stop deporting young illegal immigrants who entered the United States as children if they meet certain requirements.
According to a CNN report at the time (June 15), His Majesty said the new policy is “more fair, more efficient and more just.”
Republicans immediately — and rightly — criticized the policy, calling it an election-year political move that grants amnesty to illegal aliens and a maneuver to get around GOP opposition to elements of a Democratic proposal called the DREAM Act. DREAM is short for Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors.
One Republican congressman, Steve King of Iowa, went so far as to call the president’s order “unconstitutional and unlawful,” a circumvention of U.S. immigration law by the executive branch.
And what was the impact of the president’s executive order? Approximately 800,000 young people (a White House estimate) immediately and effectively had a status change from illegal alien to naturalized citizen — without the bother and formality of an oath-and-citizenship ceremony.
Yes, in the view of Congressman King and many, many others, this president isn’t above breaking the law or singularly establishing his own law to win favor among Hispanics and their ever-growing voting bloc.
Yes, we can trust
Obama — to oversee
Friday, Sept. 7, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. — The setup was perfect — perfect for a retort, a counterpunch, an opinion column or a political advertisement.
(To the muckity-mucks on the Mitt Romney for President campaign staff, are you paying attention?)
The setup was the big headline on the front page of a local newspaper Wednesday (Sept. 5): “FIRST LADY: ‘YOU CAN TRUST’ OBAMA.”
Yes, Michelle Obama, we can trust your husband, President Barack Hussein Obama. We can trust him in a second term (God forbid) to:
• Grow the size of government at exponential annual rates.
• Mortgage the future of our children and grandchildren with annual federal budget deficits of $1 trillion or more.
• Do nothing as the total federal debt passes $16 trillion and begins the climb to $17 trillion.
• Weaken the federal work-for-welfare mandates.
• Undermine federal immigration laws and look the other way as undocumented aliens by the scores cross into U.S. territory daily.
• Ignore federal law and circumvent the legislative process by issuing executive orders in unprecendented numbers.
• Work, with Obamacare as just a start, to bring the U.S. health-care system (one-sixth of the American economy) under total federal control.
• Belittle and punish success and reward ineptitude and irresponsibility with more government handouts.
• Attack the U.S. business sector and all who would be entrepreneurs.
• Strangle U.S. business with higher taxes and record numbers of financial and environmental regulations.
• Use the full power of the federal government, including the U.S. Justice Department and the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, to intimidate and punish his political foes.
• Allow the communist Chinese to gain a greater foothold in U.S. business and greater leverage over the American economy.
• Practice timidity in foreign policy and get pushed around by the likes of China and Russia.
• Cozy up to America’s enemies at the expense of the nation’s longtime allies.
• Sympathize with the Arabs and the Palestinian cause and throw Israel under the bus.
• Embrace the Muslim way and, at every opportunity, lift up Islam in a way that no “committed Christian” should do or would do.
• Talk, talk, talk while the Iranian government acts to build a nuclear program and, ultimately, a nuclear weapon.
• Turn a blind and callous eye on the wanton slaughter of the innocents through abortion on demand.
• Occupy the White House as a “citizen of the world” — rather than an unapologetic and pro-American leader — and work to make the United States look more each day like a weak, debt-ridden and lost Europe.
• Blame his predecessor for problems that he created or made worse since his January 2009 inauguration.
• Cook the books with economic data — the inflation rate included — to make the U.S. economy appear to be less worse off than it really is.
• Incrementally sap the strength out of the U.S. military and limit its engagement against the enemy in the war zone.
• Side with the environmental extremists who would do anything to keep the United States from tapping its own energy resources and being energy self-sufficient.
• Engage in class and social warfare, pitting the rich against the poor, the haves against the have-nots, the lower middle class against the upper middle class, employees against employeers, minorities against non-minorities, the old against the young and children against their parents.
• Take advice and/or instructions from radicals, subversives, socialists, Marxists and communists who have only disdain for the United States, its heritage, its traditional values, its great institutions and its exceptionalism.
• Promote the nation’s quickening slide toward total decadence and immorality with support for things such as same-sex “marriage.”
• Serve with an arrogance unbecoming of the presidency.
Yes, we can trust Obama. We can trust him to do little good for the sake of this nation. Why? Because we have a three-and-a-half-year record of bad policy and failure by which to judge him.
Mitt Romney says that during his presidency, he will rebuild the foundations of the American economy on the principles of free enterprise, hard work and innovation. Who can argue with a plan like that?
GOP confab, speech
might be the boosts
Mitt Romney needed
Sunday, Sept. 1, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. — The presidential campaign of Republican Mitt Romney might have turned the corner for the better with the engagement of the Republican National Convention in Tampa and Romney’s good nomination acceptance speech Thursday night (Aug. 30).
I’m feeling much better about Romney as a viable GOP candidate and about his chances for victory on Nov. 6 than I did when I posted a harsh, pre-convention assessment of his campaign and campaigning skills on Aug. 27. (See commentary below.)
I watched only about three hours of the GOP convention coverage, but what I did see and hear (primarily the speeches by Romney and his choice for running mate, Congressman Paul Ryan of Wisconsin) motivated me enough to decide that I would take some modest but concrete steps to help the Republican election cause. That would be steps beyond anything I’ve aleady posted and potentially can post to this website.
Neither the acceptance speech by Romney nor the speech by Ryan knocked my socks off, but I liked the tone, the points and the priorities — jobs, faster economic growth, a strong military, fiscal restraint, energy independence, nonappeasement in foreign affairs, a tight bond with Israel, national and moral leadership to fill a leadership vacuum, the “we-can-do-better” attitude and (Did I say it already?) more jobs.
By the time I turned off the television late Thursday following Romney’s speech, I was much more confident in the Republican presidential ticket.
Romney doesn’t have the style, charisma, communication skills and political instincts of a Ronald Reagan (it’s tough for anyone to measure up to a conservative giant and my modern-day political hero, Renaldus Magnus), but he does strike me now as a good leader; a person of broad experience in business and government; a patriot; a results-oriented man of action; an ethical, moral and caring man; a person both confident and humble; and someone grounded in reality, faith and family.
In the first speech I had ever heard from Ryan, he came across to me as an exceedingly smart, politically astute, thoughtful, funny and down-to-earth kind of guy who loves his family, loves his community, loves his state and loves his country. He complements Romney very well.
As I do what I can individually to support the Romney-Ryan ticket and a more conservative political agenda, I will continue to pray that our nation will be spared another four years of the Obama administration — one that is as bankrupt politically, idealogically and morally as the government is financially.
GOP’s Romney has
failed to impress
as a campaigner
Monday, Aug. 27, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. — On the eve of the tropical storm-delayed start of the Republican National Convention in Tampa, I’m reminded of a teaser to an article that ran in the Aug. 23 issue of a newspaper that I see often. The teaser went like this:
“Ryan fails to impress. Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney’s selection of Paul Ryan as his running mate has had little effect on Barack Obama’s lead in the White House race, polls suggest.”
Forgetting for a moment about Ryan, the fine and bright congressman from Wisconsin, might I suggest that it’s Romney, the top guy on the soon-to-be nominated GOP ticket, who has failed to impress the nation’s likely voters and Republicans especially?
Several weeks after he sewed up the Republican nomination in the primary process, do we really know anything about Romney’s core beliefs, his core political philosophy? If history is anything to go by, he’s been all over the map on all sorts of issues, abortion and health care among them.
I know, I know ... “This election is about the economy, stupid,” with hordes of people recommending that the Republican ticket downplay traditional conservative social issues as a means to defeat Obama and make him a one-term president.
Still, Romney’s penchant to bend to the political winds on social issues doen’t give me much confidence in him on other issues. Let’s face it: The guy’s a moderate, not a conservative, but the truth in that won’t keep the Obama re-election machine from trying to make him and Ryan out to be “right-wing extremists.” The Democrat ads and speeches with “extremist” as a theme already are well under way.
On the issue of universal health care, Romney will be a sitting duck for Obama in the presidential debates. Romney has a “Repeal and Replace” slogan about Obamacare, Obama’s Supreme Court-sanctioned initial move toward fully socialized and nationlized health care, but it was Romney who, as governor of Massachusetts, helped to usher in a statewide health insurance and health-care plan.
From economic policy to budget policy, from defense policy to foreign policy, from health-care policy to social and cultural policy, Obama has been a disaster for this nation as president. The fact that the presidential race remains close, with Obama perhaps leading in the polls, can’t be because Obama has been doing an acceptable job. It’s mostly a testiment to how poor Romney has been to date as the Republican nominee-in-waiting and as a campaigner.
Where’s the fight from Romney? Where’s the boldness? Where’s the confidence? Where’s the aggressiveness? Where’s the vision? Where’s Ronald Reagan when the nation so desperately needs someone of his stature and unflinching conservative convictions?
I will vote for Mitt Romney and will urge others to do so, but I have yet to be impressed or inspired by him. Here’s hoping the Romney presidential campaign will improve — and improve greatly — after the convention.
Today, the man deserves absolutely no respect from anyone, no matter what the political stripes might be.
Former Florida Gov. Charlie Crist, once a Republican, has self-servingly endorsed the re-election of President Barack Hussein Obama, a Democrat.
Sunday, Aug. 26, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. — The self-serving Charlie Crist has struck again.
With tropical storm Isaac evolving into a Florida-approaching hurricane and with Republicans gathering in Tampa for their national convention, the state’s former GOP governor came out Saturday with an endorsement of Democrat President Barack Hussein Obama.
The word “dispicable” doesn’t even come to close to describing Crist’s latest political stunt.
In a statement released very early this morning, Republican Party of Florida Chairman Lenny Curry correctly summed up Crist’s backing of Obama as a “repugnant display from a self-centered, career politician.”
Making him out to be a hypocrite and political flip-flopper without using the words, the statement goes on to describe how many times Crist publicly opposed Obama’s liberal agenda during his last two years as Florida’s RINO (Republican in Name Only) governor.
Was Crist being honest and sincere then, or is he being honest and sincere now?
The statement (you can read it in its entirety here) also painfully reminds us that while Crist once said “I don’t agree with the guy (Obama) on hardly anything he does,” he enthusiastically got on a political stage with a newly inaugurated Obama and cheerfully backed the president’s big-spending economic stimulus plan.
Crist was swept into office as Florida governor with big-time conservative support, but as time passed, and as he dropped his Republican party affiliation in mid-2010 to boost his chances to win a U.S. Senate seat, the respect Republicans and conservatives once had for him quickly evaporated.
Today, the man deserves absolutely no respect from anyone, no matter what the political stripes might be.
Neil Armstrong, the first person to walk on the moon, died Saturday (Aug. 25) at the age of 82. (NASA photo).
Memory of Neil
step’ still strong
Saturday, Aug. 25, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. — Late on this Saturday afternoon, my wife tells me that Neil Armstrong has died.
“That brings back memories,” I respond, referring to the name.
Neil Armstrong, the first man to set foot on and then walk upon the moon, died at the age of 82 of “complications resulting from cardiovascular procedures,” according to a family statement.
“That’s one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind,” Armstrong said on July 20, 1969, as he stepped from the ladder of the lunar module Eagle and planted his space boot-protected foot onto the dusty surface of the moon’s Sea of Tranquility.
It’s one of mankind’s most famous statements and one easily committed to memory. And it’s a statement I heard live as it was being spoken.
I was 8 years old, going on 9, at the time of America’s Apollo 11 moon-landing mission and living in my father’s hometown of Green Forest, Ark., way up in the Ozark Mountains in the northwest corner of the state. My father, a U.S. Army staff sergeant, was home on leave from a duty post in West Germany.
I remember watching with Dad the black-and-white family television, tuned with the help of an outdoor antenna to a CBS affiliate likely out of nearby Springfield, Mo., and hearing the unmistakable voice of newsman Walter Cronkite lead the coverage of the first lunar excursion.
I remember the coverage being at night; the living room lamps were on and it was dark outside, probably well past my normal bedtime.
I remember it being really quiet when Dad and I watched the grainy TV pictures from space and saw Armstrong take that first little hop onto the moon. Dad didn’t say anything, or anything much, and I didn’t say anything, but I do remember thinking something like “Wow!”
It was at that moment that I became deeply interested in the U.S. space program. It was an interest I made quite public, prompting a Lake Alfred science teacher to say during a fourth- or fifth-grade awards assembly that I very well could be the city’s first person in space.
Today, thinking about what Armstrong did 43 years ago along with his Apollo 11 crewmates, Edwin “Buzz” Aldrin and Michael Collins (and a cast of thousands back on Earth), “Wow!” still seems appropriate.
To Neil Armstrong, I say God speed. Though he shunned the fame and public spotlight following his daring and momentous moon mission, he was and forever will be every bit the American hero.
much too late
Friday, Aug. 24, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. — Yesterday, Aug. 23, marked the ninth anniversary of the death of my father-in-law, Larry Herbert Whitmer.
A longtime resident of the Davenport-Haines City area, he took his last breaths at Lakeland Regional Medical Center a few days after suffering a major heart attack.
I will note here for posterity that Mr. Whitmer — I always called him “Mr. Whitmer” out of great respect — was a wonderful man, a great and giving Christian, a kind and generous father-in-law to me and a terrific and loving grandfather to my two daughters.
For several reasons, I was closer to Mr. Whitmer than I was to my own father. The proximity of our homes here in Polk County had something to do with that, I suppose, but to a greater extent there was a common belief system, particularly in our shared Christian faith and conservative (politically, financially and socially) philosophy of life.
I’ve always had a strong work ethic, to the point of being labeled by many people as a workaholic. One of the best lessons I learned from Mr. Whitmer was that “Work is just a means to an end,” something that, while important and necessary, shouldn’t consume a person and keep him or her from the more meaningful things of life, like church and family.
It’s a lesson I eventually grasped — and applied to my life to a greater extent — though much too long after Mr. Whitmer’s death. I often think about all the family time I missed when I was too preoccupied with work. And today I wonder: “How much more time could I have spent with Mr. Whitmer here on Earth and how much more wisdom could I have gleaned from him had I taken his lesson to heart so much sooner?”
has a $3,100
Wednesday, Aug. 22, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. — From a recent newspaper, I saved a story about the U.S. federal budget deficit and how it had grown by $70 billion in July to reach a total of $974 billion.
It’s well on track to top $1 trillion for the fourth straight year.
(This is the budget deficit, mind you — not the total current U.S. public debt of $15.96 trillion.)
If the U.S. Census Bureau’s count is even close to being correct, and the U.S. population stands at roughly 314.2 million people, the share of the federal deficit for every man, woman and child in this country is approximately $3,100.
This means that in order to balance the federal budget deficit, every American and everyone living here legally would have to fork over $3,100 to the government, give up $3,100 in government benefits or do a combination of both.
And that’s just for a single year!
Who’s willing to do that for a year? Who’s willing to do that for all the years in the forseeable future?
The budget deficit has gotten this far out of control (we’re supposed to be comforted by a statement in the newspaper story that the deficit today is about 11.5 percent less than it was this time last year) mostly because of irresponsible or nonexistent leadership from Congress and the White House. But, we the people, also share in the blame. We’ve asked, and continue to ask, for handouts, goodies, social programs and other benefits that the government shouldn’t provide or simply can’t provide on an infinite basis.
When we point our finger of blame at government for the outrageous federal deficit and the oh-so-ominous U.S. national debt, remember that we have a lot more fingers pointing back at us.
Let’s focus on the
81.1% of Polk’s
eligible voters who
didn’t vote Aug. 14
Wednesday, Aug. 15, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. — I voted in the Tuesday (Aug. 14) primary election here in Polk County and have the “I Voted” sticker to prove it. (See the photo above.)
The Polk County Supervisor of Elections Office reports that I was joined in the voting by 63,892 of my fellow county residents.
Sadly, no, make that appallingly, about 224,165 Polk residents, the balance of those registered with the elections office, didn’t vote. They sat out the election, failing to exercise their right and privilege as Americans to have a democratic say-so in local, state and national government.
Tuesday’s election, though a primary, was a general election and open to any registered voter, no matter what the party affiliation might be. It wasn’t a closed primary just for Democrats or just for Republicans.
More people should’ve known about the election. More people should’ve been interested. More people should’ve voted.
To illustrate the problem, I’ll share this: Two of my co-workers, both intelligent men in responsible positions, both will many years of experience with newspapers and in publishing, actually we’re surprised Tuesday when they learned, or saw from the sticker, that I had voted. “Election? What election?” one asked. “You voted?” asked the other, absolutely unaware of the primary election. Incredibly, the only election they knew about was the big one coming up Nov. 6.
Election officials had predicted a voter turnout of 18 percent. They probably were tickled pink that the final turnout was a higher 18.9 percent. In my book, that’s not an achievement. That“s just pathetic — and a sign of two very disturbing problems in this country. They are ignorance and apathy among the citizens.
Here’s a message to registered voters who don’t vote and a message to all voting-eligible Americans who don’t even bother to register: “Your voting rights: If you don’t use ’em, you very well could lose ’em.”
ripe for a few
Tuesday, Aug. 14, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. — Following some absolutely dreadful and disgusting action by the national-level Democrats on Saturday (Aug. 11), here’s what Jonathan D. Salant of BusinessWeek wrote:
“Democrats unanimously voted today to endorse same-sex marriage in their party’s platform, the first time a major political party has supported the issue in its statement of policies.
“Today’s action at the platform committee meeting in Detroit sends the document for ratification by delegates to next month’s Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, North Carolina. President Barack Obama, a Democrat, said in May that he supports same-sex marriage. Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney doesn’t. ...”
If the committee’s work is formally adopted by the Democratic convention delegates — and there’s not much reason to believe it won’t be — what new nicknames will we be able to apply to the onetime party of Harry S. Truman and John F. Kennedy?
- The Homosexual Party?
- The Gay Party?
- The Anti-Bible Party?
- The Immorality Party?
- The Party of Sin?
- The Sodomy Party?
- The Anti-God Party?
- The Anti-Christian Party?
- The Party of Ill Repute?
- The Revolting Party?
- The Disgusting Party?
Harsh? Perhaps. Truthful? Absolutely. You could use any one of these nicknames; each one easily would hit the mark.
Will this action by Democrats at the national level attract more people to the party? Or will it drive away any of the more reasonable, conservative and moral rank-and-file Democrats?
For the good of the nation — for the sake of our children and grandchildren — I hope for the latter.
Eat mor chikin?
I’ll do it — and
quietly make a
Tuesday, July 31, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. — The roadside sign outside the local church reads this way:
“Eat more chicken. Don’t be one. Support family values.”
To the uninitiated, the words are just gibberish, but anyone who pays any attention whatsoever to current events will know the background to the message.
The Chick-fil-A restaurant chain is in the news following comments its Christian president, Dan Cathy, made to the Baptist Press. Cathy said the company, known for keeping its restaurants shuttered on Sundays, the Lord’s Day, is “guilty as charged” for backing “the biblical definition of a family” — and not the concocted “gay marriages” now openly supported by our current president. Later, in a radio interview, Cathy said “I think we are inviting God’s judgment on our nation when we shake our fist at him and say, ‘We know better than you as to what constitutes a marriage.’ ”
Long the target of militant homosexual groups and rank-and-file liberals for its Christian business principles and financial support of conservative organizations like the Family Research Council, Chick-fil-A is the subject of renewed boycott calls by gay-rights advocates. Leaders of leftist-dominated cities like Boston and Chicago are getting in on the act, too, condemning Cathy’s statements and saying Chick-fil-A isn’t welcome in their business communities.
But, Christians around the nation are fighting back, eating more at Chick-fil-A restaurants throughout the land and planning to heed the call by former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, a Baptist minister, to make this coming Wednesday (Aug. 1) “Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day.” The purpose is to support a company whose executives are willing to take a public stand for godly values.
Huckabee has asked that Christians, and anyone else who supports traditional family values and the traditional definition of marriage, to visit a Chick-fil-A at any time on Wednesday and buy a chicken sandwich or something else on the menu. The idea is to financially and quietly support the company and its leaders — not to make a scene by marching, picketing, shouting or shaking a fist in someone’s face.
I’ve made plans to take part and will gladly drive out of my way to do it. A Chick-fil-A restaurant is coming — eventually — to Winter Haven, but until then the nearest ones to my home are two in Lakeland, one on South Florida Avenue and the other at Lakeland Square, the mall on U.S. Highway 98 North.
Having a delicious Chick-fil-A chicken sandwich is a good enough reason to visit one of the restaurants, but on Wednesday I’ll go for more important reasons: 1. To join the worthy effort started by Huckabee; 2. To patronize a fine company; 3. To support Dan Cathy’s courage and principled stand for faith and traditional family values; 4. To help make up for any economic damage a homosexual and liberal boycott might do to Chick-fil-A; and 5. To quietly but firmly send a statement to the social liberals, including President Barack Hussein Obama, that they won’t be able to force their twisted brand of family values on me.
Will you join me and others for “Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day”? Will you regularly support Chick-fil-A with your fast-food dollars? I hope you will.
People supporting the Chick-fil-A company and executives in the social war over family values turned out in droves at restaurants all across the nation on Wednesday (Aug. 1), “Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day.” These photos were taken between 8 and 8:30 p.m. at the extremely busy Chick-fil-A on South Florida Avenue in Lakeland (Fla.).
here’s a follow-up
Thursday, Aug. 2, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. — I made good on my plans to participate Wednesday (Aug. 1) in “Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day” and was pleased to have been a part of the great outpouring of support for this fine company and the moral people who lead it.
I ended up at the Chick-fil-A on South Florida Avenue in Lakeland (Fla.) around 8:15 p.m. and was very happy and perhaps even a bit surprised to see the place jammed with patrons at that late hour. I knew the call for people to support Chick-fil-A, as a response to the attacks it has received from militant homosexual groups and liberals, would bring the company a lot of increased business Wednesday, but I honestly didn’t think “Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day” would be as tremendously successful as it turned out to be.
My hope is that social conservatives will continue to support Chick-fil-A in the days, weeks and months that follow and not stop with just one special day of action.
Wisconsin vote shows that society’s takers can
Thursday, June 7, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. — The failure of the
unionists, Democrats and others on the left to remove
Republican Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker from office early was
not an insignificant event.
For one thing, Walker’s convincing victory over
Democrat Tom Barrett in the recall election Tuesday (June 5)
gave rise to the hope that the people who would, with their
insatiable appetite for taxpayer-funded programs and benefits,
destroy our states and our nation economically, can be
Walker was targeted for recall mostly because he dared
to take on the public-service unions in an attempt to put
Wisconsin’s fiscal house in order. But, he also was
targeted simply because he’s a conservative Republican
who won election as governor in 2010 in a mostly left-leaning
Much is being made about the potential negative affect
the Wisconsin vote will have on the re-election campaign of
President Barack Hussein Obama. While the political and
economic issues in Wisconsin might be a microcosm of the
national picture, those who want so badly for Obama to be a
one-term president should be cautioned that the Wisconsin
election was a referendum on Gov. Walker, his policies and his
leadership of the state — not on the person, policies and
leadership of our sitting president.
More about all of this later ...
Conservative columnist George F. Will is shown in a
recent publicity photo.
George Will simply
an extraordinary thinker and writer
Tuesday, June 5, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. — George F. Will, the
nationally syndicated conservative columnist, is, in a word,
Consider his most recent piece about the
“childish” Wisconsin progressives — I
won’t be so kind; they’re Marxist unionists —
who forced today’s attempt by statewide election to
recall Republican Gov. Scott Walker.
Will’s column, titled “Wisconsin’s
Peter Pan Progressivism,” was in the local newspapers
Sunday, but if you didn’t catch it, it can be found
The Wisconsin unionists have been mighty unhappy with
Walker’s work, following his election in 2010, to rein in
out-of-control public spending on pensions and health-care
benefits for ever-demanding government employees.
I won’t spoil Will’s column by telling
anything more about it — you really should read it for
yourself — but I will say that it’s quintessential
George F. Will: High quality in writing, substance, reasoning
I use the adjective “quintessential” (go
ahead, look it up) purposefully and in homage to Will, whose
excellent vocabulary and use of the English language lead many
to say — sometimes to complain — that he uses
“too many big words.”
Would-be journalists and writers usually are taught to
avoid “quarter words” when “nickel
words” will do, but in Will’s case, in his writing,
“quarter words” seem to be the most appropriate
words. They seem to work just fine. (And it’s not an
awful thing for a writer to send a reader to a dictionary once
in a while.)
My late father, Harold Dean Braddy, was a politically
active Republican and an avid newspaper reader. Though it often
made him angry, the opinion or editorial page was — as it
is for me — his favorite page in the paper and George
Will was his favorite columnist. But even Dad, as bright as he
was, told me on one occasion that sometimes he had to read a
Will column twice to thoroughly get the writer’s
My career as a journalist and newspaper editor has
provided me with many opportunities to meet and talk with
politicians, pro sports figures, celebrities and other famous
people. To my great delight, George Will was one of
Will was the speaker in 1992 or thereabouts for the
annual Winter Haven Hospital Foundation fundraiser, and I was
fortunate to receive an invitation to ride with the foundation
official whose task it was to drive to Orlando International
Airport, meet Will and bring him to Winter Haven. I was with
the foundation representative when he greeted Will at the
airport terminal, and later I interviewed the columnist (and
regular commentator on ABC’s “This Week”
Sunday morning TV news show) from the backseat of the
I found it interesting that Will, the journalist,
interviewer and commentator (and very nice fellow, by the way),
was being interviewed by another journalist and commentator
Not only is Will a great writer, he’a brilliant
conservative thinker, as evidenced by anything anyone reads
from him. You don’t earn a Pulitzer Prize for commentary,
as he as done, by writing fluff.
In a memorable column from a couple of years ago, Will
wrote about the crisis of federal deficit spending —
expenses currently exceed revenues by $1.3 trillion — and
how people often demand that government follow the example of
American households and “live within its means.”
The point of his column was that government is indeed following
the example of most American households — by living
beyond its means, by spending more than it takes in and by
mounting huge piles of debt.
I don’t do the column true justice by trying to
summarize it from memory.
I think back to the wisdom and brilliance of that
column when I ponder what I want to be, who I want to be like,
when I grow up — as a writer, as a commentator and as a
conservative thinker. In the arena of current conservative
columnists and thinkers, George F. Will would be tough to top
as a role model.
Will the preachers flee the NAACP after its decision
Wednesday, May 23, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. — So, the NAACP now says it
supports same-sex (gay) “marriage.”
In the words of Dana Carvey’s the Church Lady,
“Isn’t that special.”
The Saturday (May 20) announcement, following a
meeting of the board of directors of the National Association
for the Advancement of Colored People, was seen as a two-fold
1. To give political cover to President Barack Hussein
Obama, who said about 10 days earlier that he now believes
“personally” that homosexuals should be allowed to
“marry” each other.
2. To help shore up one of Obama’s bases, the
black vote, which some political pundits say could be fractured
because of the president’s new-found enlightenment about
According to the NAACP board, the policy move on
same-sex “marriage” is a “continuation of its
historic commitment to equal protection under the
“The mission of the (NAACP) has always been to
ensure political, social and economic equality of all
people,” said Roslyn M. Brock, chairman of the board of
the 103-year-old civil rights organization. “We have and
will oppose efforts to codify discrimination into
Traditionally, the leadership of the NAACP has been
dominated by black ministers, but people who tend to become
“reverends” more for political rather than for
Gospel-spreading reasons. (The “Rev.” Jesse Jackson
and the “Rev.” Al Sharpton immediately come to
It will be interesting to see how many of these
ministers, those in NAACP leadership and those as group members
and supporters, walk away from the organization following its
immoral decision in support of immoral acts — homosexual
behavior and so-called “gay marriage.”
Here, according to a FoxNews.com report, is an
indication of how that’s going to go:
“Black religious leaders — who
traditionally have opposed same-sex marriage — originally
opposed the president’s recent decision but appear to
have softened their position in recent days.
“Pastor Emmett Burns said on the Sunday
following the president’s May 9 announcement that he
opposed the decision but this week reportedly said he would
vote for Obama.
“Burns, a delegate in the Maryland state
legislature, was among the lawmakers who strongly opposed a
same-sex marriage bill that passed in the Assembly this year.
He helped defeat the bill last year.”
This series of events shows a lot of things —
none of them good — but in particular it shows just how
weak and uncommitted to God’s Word the pastors are in
churches — black, white and otherwise — all across
And people wonder why things are going so terribly
wrong in this once-great nation.
If we can’t get some grounding in moralty from
the pulpits and from the White House, where on God’s
Earth will it come from?
What once was considered right is now called
Sunday, May 13, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
HAVEN, Fla. — One thing I read Friday and another thing I
heard this morning at church together summed up well the awful
state of this nation and this world.
Here’s what I saw Friday, for a newspaper dated
“Obama sets social issues trap for (GOP presidential
candidate Mitt) Romney ... Some believe the president aims to
paint Republicans as cultural extremists ...”
Here’s what I heard from the pulpit from my pastor
during the morning worship service today:
“The more the world goes to the left, the more extreme
our Bible position sounds.”
What was decent, right, good, wholesome, acceptable and
moral — such as marriage only between a man and a woman
— not even a full generation ago is suddenly branded as
“extreme” by the cultural and societal elitists and
our so-called leaders, President Obama among them.
Truth and goodness and the standards for solid and sober
living haven’t changed through the ages, but man has
changed — for the worse. Increasingly, man has deviated
from the good and proper and embraced the hollow worldliness
that leads only to emptiness, ruined lives and sorrow.
In the case of our nation, the path it’s on, the path
chosen by our current government, will result not in continued
greatness but in second-rate status.
Man was warned thousands of years ago that the time will
come when evil is called good and good is called evil. That
time has arrived. That time is now.
Dad’s eternal home?
I can’t say for sure
Today, Sept. 30, 2012, would’ve been the 76th birthday of my father, Harold Dean Braddy, but, sadly, he died several years ago of a massive heart attack.
I so wish that I had known my father better, that I had been with him more, that I had talked with him more and that I had questioned him more — about his life, about his interests, about his military career and about his 11 or so years with my mother.
I also wish that I could be sure that one day I’ll see my father again in Heaven. Based on what I do know about Dad — about the way he lived his life, about the priorities he had, about the way he talked and about his description of himself as an “agnostic” (one who believes that nothing can be known about the existence or nature of God and life beyond this life) — I can’t have that confidence. I really don’t even have that hope.
Where we will be in the afterlife, Heaven or Hell, depends on critical decisions we make in this life. Once a person dies unsaved, without the saving knowledge and faith in Jesus Christ, no amount of prayer and pleading to God by family members and friends left behind will rescue that person from an eternity in torment.
That’s tragic in the human sense, but that’s what a righteous God teaches in His Word.
The lesson? We as Christians must reach our unsaved loved ones and friends for Christ. Now. Before they’re suddenly snatched away from us. Before it’s too late. — JB (Sept. 30, 2012)
Union types skip
work to mock GOP
On Aug. 29, during the Republican National Convention in Tampa, the anti-GOP protesters included a group of labor union types. You know, organized electricians, carpenters, welders, plumbers, pipefitters and the like.
On this particular day, the union members were organized to mock the Republicans’ “We Built It” slogan, one of the many themes to their convention. “We Built It,” of course, has been the conservative response one of the responses at least to President Barack Hussein Obama’s ludicrous statement of contempt to business owners and entrepreneurs: “If you’ve got a business, you didn’t build that.”
The union protestors, shown in a printed newspaper photo gallery, carried signs and banners that included this statement: “We are the workers who built it.”
When I saw the sign, my first thought was: “Yeah, you built it — at half the speed and at twice the cost.”
And then a couple of questions came to mind: “And why aren’t these people working? Shouldn’t they be on the job and building something instead of protesting?” — JB (Sept. 5, 2012)
Vandalism no way
to praise Jesus
“JESUS IS LORD,” the spray-painted message boldly declared.
I saw it yesterday, during the drive to work, on the side of a big CSX Intermodal container box a semi-tractor was pulling along on a trailer in front of me.
The message is correct — Jesus is lord and lord of all — but I’m thinking the Lord is none too pleased that someone vandalized private property to praise His name.
To the person who did this, shame on you. — JB (Aug. 25, 2012)
What kind of woman
converts to Islam?
The question was asked the other day (by a person I greatly admire and respect): “Why would any woman want to convert to Islam?”
The question was asked mainly in the context of American or Western women, not those born and raised in a Muslim country or predominately Muslim culture.
The question was asked with the full knowledge and understanding that women in the Islamic religion and culture are treated as something even less than second-class citizens. In Muslim-dominated lands, the dogs at home and on the street get more respect than women and wives, the person with the original question observed.
It’s a question not easily answered (Could Islam’s Western women converts have a mental screw or two loose?), but perhaps our current president, Barack Hussein Obama, can address it. After all, he seems to have a “special” insight into Islam that no other U.S. president has had. — JB (Aug. 16, 2012)
The U.S. Treasury
must be hurting
Because of some technical problems with e-filing, I had to mail to the U.S. Internal Revenue Service a paper version of the family’s 2011 tax return.
That was on May 19. (Yes, the return was late, but it was filed within the rules.)
As of this writing, almost three months after mailing the return, we’re still waiting on the refund to hit our savings account. An Internet-based inquiry with the IRS about the status of refund provided only this response: “Your tax return has been received and is being processed.”
Having waited this long for the refund, I can only surmise that Uncle Sam, with his $15.9 trillion in federal public debt, thinks he needs the money more than I do. — JB (Aug. 16, 2012)
Aug. 23 update: With midnight approaching today, there’s still no sign of a tax refund. Where are the tax return processors for the IRS? Have they been conscripted for service in President Obama’s re-election army? Just wondering ...
Smoking one habit I don’t have to break
As I watch a co-worker struggle to give up smoking
(and as I hope and pray for his success), I am so very thankful
that I never took up the highly addictive cigarette
Oh, I tried cigarettes, as a 10- or 11-year-old, but I
felt so guilty about it that I stopped before I learned to
inhale and never wanted to touch those nasty things
There’s one thing we know about a bad habit, smoking
included: If you don’t start one, you won’t have
it to break later on. — JB (March 29, 2012)
9/12 Project Group
Promoting the U.S. Constitution and America’s
core traditional values.
What’s not to love about that?
That’s the general purpose behind the Winter
Haven 9/12 Project Group and others like it across the
These project groups had their genesis with
conservative broadcaster Glenn Beck three years ago. (See the
website here.) The name comes from the premise that
on 9/12/2001, the day following the 9/11 terrorist attacks on
the United States, Americans of all faiths, views, walks of
life and political pursuasions were of one accord and united.
(Remember all the “United We Stand” T-shirts and
The Winter Haven group meets each Thursday, from 7 to
8:30 p.m., in the Poolside Room at the Chain O’ Lakes
Complex at Cypress Gardens Boulevard and U.S. Highway 17.
Meetings, often with special speakers and presentations, are free and open to the public.
For details about the Winter Haven 9/12 Project
Group, e-mail member Tom Williams at Williams7098@tampabay.rr.com. The group also
has a website at www.winterhaven912.org.
— JB (March 18, 2012)
The website for the Republican
presidential nominee, Mitt Romney: http://www.mittromney.com/
A great book from a former Winter Haven
newspaper editor (and good friend): http://tinyurl.com/77aje5e
An excellent resource for conservatives and
conservative ideas: http://www.heritage.org/
Another good source of news from, for and
about the right: http://www.1776coalition.com/
For fine portraits and quality commercial
photography: http://www.pezzimenti.com/ and http://pezzimentiphotography.com/
An interesting read on our great 16th
president, Abraham Lincoln: http://lincolnlaughing.com/
Anyone who loved our 40th president will love
For great, useful and trendy technology:
A great community project: http://ritzoncentral.com/
A good movie: It’s a low-budget
film called “Fireproof,” starring Kirk Cameron.
You’ll cry — if you have any kind of heart at
For breakfast out: Fred’s
Southern Kitchen, 1551 Third St., S.W. (U.S. Highway 17),
Winter Haven. The breakfast buffet is wonderful.
For supper out: Manny’s
Original Chophouse, 1100 Third St., S.W. (U.S. Highway 17),
Winter Haven. The food is good and the prices are
A marquee outside a local personal storage
business: “Land of the free because of the
brave.” (It’s on bumper stickers, too.)
A local church sign: “Spend
less time on Facebook and more time in His
An open invitation to attend: http://centralbaptistchurchwh.com/
Strikes: The biggest and baddest
strikes that can be given go to a federal appeals court that on
May 31 struck down a key provision to the Defense of Marriage
Act. A three-judge panel of the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals
— located in Boston in the heart of the land of liberals,
socialists, “enlightened” college professors and
Barney Franks — rule unanimously that the section of the
act that defines marriage as being the union of a man and woman
Strikes: To the Obama administration
for not coming to the defense of the federal Defense of
Marriage Act. Of course, we know now that President Obama is
just fine and dandy with the “marriage” of
Stars: For the “Vote 4
Energy” campaign, which was launched Jan. 4 to promote
more domestic energy production and sensible energy policy. A
“Vote 4 Energy” also would mean, by and large, a
vote for conservative candidates, because the liberal version
of energy policy — windmills, limited domestic oil
drilling, oil pipeline opposition, no new oil refineries,
carbon taxes, “global warming” fixes and Chevy
Volts — is anything but sensible. “Vote 4
Energy” is being funded by the American Petroleum
Institute, the lobbying arm of Big Oil, but that’s OK.
Attacked at almost every turn, Big Oil has every right to enter
the political fray and ask Americans to “demand smarter
energy policy.” On the Web: vote4energy.org
Strikes: To “corporate
welfare,” including any received by Big Oil and ethanol
producers. Huge companies don’t need subsidies from the
taxpayers, and besides, our debt-ridden federal government
can’t afford them.
An Rx for America
America is sick — and in all ways possible: Politically, financially, socially, culturally, physically, psychologically, morally and spiritually. But the Lord God, the righteous, all-wise and omnipotent One who guilded imperfect men and women as they gave life to these United States, has a prescription for what ails this once-great nation. It can be found in Chapter 7 and Verse 14 in the Old Testament book of 2 Chronicles (above). For those who would say “It’s too simplistic an answer for the nation’s many complex problems,” Christians can respond: “Nothing we’re doing is working. Why not trust in God’s wisdom — God’s instructions — and lean on Him?” — JB (Sept. 17, 2012)
National Dems show their
hostility toward God, Israel
Thursday, Sept. 6, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. — The brouhaha that erupted Wednesday (Sept. 5) during the Democratic National Convention over platform references to God and the issue of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital shows two things very clearly:
1. The party increasingly is being dominated and influenced by people who are anti-God and anti-Israel.
2. For political reasons, key among them the retention of the presidency, some Democrats in top national positions would do almost anything, including ramming through a platform change that didn’t have rank-and-file support, to desperately mask the party’s anti-God and anti-Israel attitude.
In short, here’s what happened with the Democrats:
The people who wrote the 2012 party platform, the party’s policy or “mission” statement, took out a 2008 platform reference to people’s “God-given potential” and a section that recognized Israel’s claim to Jerusalem as its historical and hoped-for future capital city. (Tel Aviv is the Jewish nation’s working capital until the decades-old Jerusalem question is resolved.)
Faced with mounting Republican and other criticism over the God and Jerusalem platform references, more accurately the deliberate omission of those references, a few Democratic leaders (supposedly at the behest of President Barack Hussein Obama) sprung into action to “correct” the 2012 platform and have it read in these sections like the 2008 document.
When the “corrections”were put to a vote — three votes, actually — of the Democratic convention delegates Wednesday, the convention chairman, Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, said to a loud chorus of “Boos” and “Nos” that the “Ayes” had it.
Most convention observers reported that the “Ayes” didn’t have it in “the brief but chaotic procedural move” (the way FoxNews.com reported it) — that the convention delegates really didn’t want the God and Jerusalem language and were none too happy with the way the voice votes were handled.
Among the delegates who felt “shammed” by the platform vote was Rashida Tlaib. An online Fox News report referred to her as “a member of the Michigan delegation and the state’s House of Representatives.” What Fox News didn’t report is that Tlaib proudly describes herself as “the first Muslim elected to the Michigan legislature.”
Should there be any surprise that a Muslim wouldn’t support Jerusalem as the true capital of Israel?
While the platform votes over the God and Jerusalem references remain disputed, what can’t be disputed is the growing Democratic Party hostility toward the nation of Israel and, more disturbingly, party hostility toward God and the things of God.
The Democrats ... They have no idea who and what they’re messing with. Shouldn’t they know by now that if they play with fire, that eventually they’re going to get burned?
chops Polk into 4 districts
Monday, Sept. 3, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. — Driving around Winter Haven the past couple of weeks, I started seeing “Daniel Webster for Congress” yard signs pop up and thought: “That’s odd. Webster is from the Orlando area. Shouldn’t I be seeing ‘Dennis Ross for Congress’ signs?”
And then I remembered that this was a political redistricing year, following the 2010 U.S. census count, and that Florida, with its larger population, was picking up a couple of congressional seats. “Maybe redistricting has affected the congressional lines on this side of Polk County,” I thought.
A little research revealed that to be the case.
For the past several years, Polk County has been almost entirely in the 12th Congressional District, but now it’s home to parts of four districts, and District 12 isn’t even among them. Ross, a Republican from Lakeland, was elected two years ago to represent District 12 in Congress, but now he’s in District 15 and won’t be representing the greater Winter Haven area with the sitting of the new Congress in January 2013. He’s assured of a second congressional term because he drew no opposition this year — another reason we’re not seeing “Ross for Congress” signs anywhere in Polk County.
The newly realigned District 15 that Ross will represent (see map) covers only about a quarter of Polk, the northwest area encompassing Lakeland, Bartow and Mulberry, and the northeast part of Hillsborough County, including the Plant City and Temple Terrace areas.
A solid conservative and Republican, Webster served in the Florida House of Representatives and state Senate before being elected to Congress two years ago in the old 8th Congressional District. He’s now running for re-election in the newly aligned 10th District, which includes north-central Polk County, southwest Orange County and almost all of Lake County.
Northeast Polk County is included in the 9th Congressional District, with southern Polk covered by a large 17th District.
Webster does have opposition in the Nov. 6 election for Congress. The Democratic candidate is Val Demmings, a social worker who went into law enforcement and rose to the post of Orlando chief of police. An independent candidate is Naipaul Seegoam, a real estate professional, small business owner and native of Guyana in South America.
I might be going out on a limb here, but I’m predicting a comfortable victory for Webster (he has my vote) in the general election and sensing that he’ll represent greater Winter Haven very well in the nation’s capital.
Check your newly issued Polk County voter identification card to see which congressional district now covers the area where you live. If you need to do some election research, a good place to start is a website called BallotPedia.
Wrong parties get blame
for public school failures
Saturday, Aug. 25, 2012
By JAMES W. MacMEEKIN III
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. — So! The Florida Department of Education has announced failing grades for Haines City’s Boone Middle School and Lake Alfred-Addair Middle School. Grading was based upon test results from the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT). Polk County Public Schools Superintendent Sherrie Nickell commented: “Basing performance on one test is disconcerting ... but, for now this is the measure by which we are judged.”
There is every reason to suggest that the wrong party has failed our children. At present, every administrator and teacher at Boone Middle School is in danger of losing his or her job in 2014, as a result of one test — the FCAT — taken by about 800 students. Other optional penalties include closing down a brand-new, multimillion-dollar campus, operating the school with district management or assigning the students to other schools.
(The grading procedure for the FCAT has since been found in error, affecting 213 schools throughout Florida. However, it appears that Boone Middle’s F grade will remain.
Compounding the school’s problems, the FCAT test was changed in mid-year. And, sadly, two of Boone’s assistant principals have already been released.)
Even if the defendants were guilty, the varied penalties are insane! Here’s why:
For the pro-choicers, read
this important message
Monday, July 30, 2012
By JACK MURPHY
On Townhall.com on July 21, columnist Ken Blackwell wrote an article titled “President Obama’s Covert Zeal.” He makes the point that President Barack Obama is the single most driven president we have had when it comes to the abortion issue. He has even directed efforts at other countries around the world to promote pro-choice policies in their lands. Apparently, the 50 million aborted babies we have seen here do not satisfy him. We are not aborting babies fast enough for him.
In recent times, there have been numerous attempts to legislate the onset of “personhood.” In fact, the U.S. Supreme Court itself has hinted that such an action by Congress would be the way to curb abortion by using the 14th Amendment. It deals with the use of the word “person” to enumerate the protections afforded to each citizen in matters of due process and equal protection of rights. When we define personhood to commence at the point of conception, that child would become protected immediately.
Several years ago, when he was asked about the moment when a person is actually formed, Obama very glibly remarked, “That is above my pay grade.” This is hardly surprising. Much of what he has done since he has assumed presidential office has been above his pay grade. His background does not contain evidence of any business or organizational leadership skills. He served less than one term in the U.S. Senate, voting “present” a large percentage of the time.
In recent years, a number of states have fought to reduce the number of abortions by requiring pregnant women to witness the scanned images of the growing babies within their wombs. This has brought about a slight reduction in abortions. Seeing the beating heart of a living child can have a great impact on a mother-to-be. No longer can she delude herself into believing the baby is only a thing.
I would like something else to be added to the attempts at persuasion to choose life. Ken Blackwell has included a quotation that I have read sometime in the past. Unfortunately, it slipped away into the unknown. It is a keeper that could be as persuasive as an ultrascan image. After describing the actions of the Clintons, Bill and Hillary, he goes on to include the following paragraph:
“Like the Clintons, President Obama opposed the ban on partial-birth abortions. Nurse Brenda Pratt Shafer described what she saw in a partial-birth abortion. It requires re-reading now: ‘I stood at the doctor’s side and watched him perform a partial-birth abortion on a woman who was six months pregnant. The baby’s heartbeat was clearly visible on the ultrasound screen. The doctor delivered the baby’s body and arms, everything but his little head. The baby’s body was moving. His little fingers were clasping together. He was kicking his feet. The doctor took a pair of scissors and inserted them into the back of the baby’s head, and the baby’s arms jerked out in a flinch, a startle reaction, like a baby does when he thinks that he might fall. Then the doctor opened the scissors and he stuck the high-powered suction tube into the hole and sucked the baby’s brains out. Now the baby was completely limp. I never went back to the clinic. But I am still haunted by the face of that little boy. It was the most perfect, angelic face I have ever seen.’ ”
I don’t know how any person could see an ultrasound image and read a description like this and even consider supporting abortion. We all need to support the issue of personhood when it comes up in our states. We need to do our part to stop the next 50 million babies from ending up in millions of medical waste buckets.
The time will come in the future when all of us are going to stand before the Creator of all babies. I would like to be there when President Obama learns the true meaning of the term “pay grade.”
Jack Murphy of Maine is a winter resident of Frostproof,
Fla., and compiler of the “Styles of Smiles”
column that runs monthly in the News Chief newspaper in Winter
Haven. At this posting, he is back at his summertime home in
Maine and can be reached by e-mail at email@example.com.
Justice Roberts: Did he ‘go liberal’ or was opinion a brilliant ruse?
Tuesday, July 17, 2012
By JAMES W. MacMEEKIN III
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. — Our U.S. Supreme Court has ruled on the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (2010), otherwise known as Obamacare.
At the conclusion of Chief Justice John Roberts’ remarks, Associate Justice Antonin Scalia bowed his head, U.S. Sen. Orrin Hatch’s jaw dropped, Glenn Beck went absolutely bananas and Rush Limbaugh used every negative adjective in his extensive vocabulary, throwing in a few well-chosen expletives for flavor.
Their reactions are classic examples of one’s use of tongue before engaging the brain. In all cases, their reaction was the instantaneous response to a judicial decision never contemplated. That’s understandable. What isn’t understandable is that none of America’s pundits have bothered to read Roberts’ remarks! Justice Roberts carefully and purposely outlined the reasons for his decision, which eventually will be classified as one of the most brilliant judicial acts in Supreme Court history!
U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, above
left, is being hailed by the left and derided by the right as
the man who, by and large, saved Obamacare following the high
court’s review of the controversial health-care legislation.
In the other image, submitted by Pixie Rubin, Lady Liberty weeps
as the United States of America becomes the United Socialist
States of America.
Obamacare clarified as the nation’s largest
Friday, June 29, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. — The convoluted and muddled
thinking that went into the deplorable salvation of Obamacare
by the U.S. Supreme Court deserves at least a convoluted and
muddled response by Joe Q. Public.
The following stream of consciousness is not a knee-jerk
reaction to the court’s Thursday (June 28) release of
the 5-4 decision that basically preserves the 2011 Affordable
Care Act, better known derisively as Obamacare. No, several
hours have gone by since the decision was announced, providing
ample time for a wide and swinging range of emotions, among
them surprise, anger, amazement, disappointment, sadness, melancholy,
resignation, motivation and determination.
Perhaps something here will make sense. If it doesn’t,
it wouldn’t be any different than all the other nonsensical
things going on — and going on with greater frequency
— in this once-great nation of ours.
• When news of the Supreme Court’s decision
came live, between 10 and 10:30 a.m., the immediate reaction
here was great disppointment rather than anger. I was disappointed
because Obamacare was — and now remains — bad and
overreaching law that will cost the nation and its people dearly
on more than just a financial level.
• Given the negative trend of recent national
developments — on “gay marriage,” immigration,
the Keystone XL oil pipeline and the economy, for example —
I wasn’t surprised that the close vote by the high court
favored President Barack Hussein Obama and the liberals who
gave us Obamacare. What did surprise me, and surprised me greatly,
was the justice who provided the swing vote — Chief Justice
John Roberts. I thought, like many others, that had Obamacare
passed constitutional muster, that Justice Anthony Kennedy would
have been the deciding vote. Instead, Kennedy strongly dissented
with the majority, rightly arguing that Obamacare had no constitutional
ground to stand on.
• Roberts found that while Obamacare, and its mandate
that everyone buy health-care insurance, wouldn’t be permissable
under the commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution — Congress
can’t force anyone to buy insurance or any other commodity
— it is constitutional under the taxing clause, with Congress
able to modify behavior and induce social change through the
tax code and tax penalties. Oh, what a can of worms that reasoning
will open! Roberts, the so-called conservative chief justice,
today must be a big disappointment to George W. Bush, the man
who nominated him to the Supreme Court. Aided by the four liberals
on the court, Roberts basically rewrote Obamacare by judicial
fiat to make it work and avoid rejecting it.
• If, as Roberts and the liberal justices reasoned,
Obamacare funding has legitimacy as a tax-and-spend enterprise,
the court’s ruling clarifies the health insurance act
as a monumental tax increase — the largest one in U.S.
history and perhaps the largest in world history. And it provides
conservatives, libertarians and Tea Party types with another
mighty campaign issue leading up to the presidential and congressional
• Obamacare wasn’t sold as a tax measure.
In fact, the president went out of his way on many occasions
before the act was voted on to state that it wasn’t a
tax. He knew the American public wouldn’t accept a huge
tax increase in the midst of a great economic recession. He
also knew that he had pledged no new taxes for anyone with an
annual income less than $250,000. So, what the Supreme Court
has done is to tag Obamacare with the label that opponents rightly
applied to it before and after it was passed — a tax increase
with huge economic and societal costs. Given that Obamacare
was sold as a lie, I would like nothing more than to have it
go to a revote in Congress as a tax issue rather than a health-care
and health insurance issue. The big question is: How many Democrats
would support the act a second time around in its proper context
as a tax increase?
• Obamacare is less of a health insurance and
health-care overhaul than another liberal-socialist ploy to
make more people more dependent upon the government. And it’s
just a transitional step toward the planned-for creation of
a single-payer insurance system with federal government in charge
of all facets of health care in this country. In the run-up
to the 2008 election, Obama made it clear to the unions that
strongly support him that he, too, wants a single-payer system
but that the American people have to be conditioned over time
to accept it. In that effort, the president found an unlikely
ally in the U.S. Supreme Court and, more so, in Chief Justice
Initial great disappointment in the Supreme Court decision
led to optimism that Obamacare’s survival, and its proper
labeling as the nation’s largest-ever tax increase, will
be the pivotal event that motivates and energizes the right
to work harder than ever to elect more conservatives to Congress
and to help Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney (the
“Repeal and Replace Obamacare” candidate) make Barack
Obama a one-term president. Given its blessing by the U.S. Supreme
Court, the only way now to get rid of Obamacare is to toss out
of office the people who forced it upon us and the man for which
it is not so lovingly named.
Sunrises over the Atlantic were great vacation
Thursday, June 21, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. —— I took a brief vacation
trip to a beach on Florida’s east coast recently, and
among my most enjoyable moments was the time I spent watching
the sun come up over the Atlantic Ocean on back-to-back mornings.
is a photo I took on the second morning. It was a beautiful
and glorious morning indeed.
It occurred to be me later, on the drive back
home to Winter Haven, that I’ve seen a lot of sunsets
over the Gulf of Mexico, but I can’t recall a previous
time that I awoke really early at an Atlantic-side beach and
watched a sunrise over the ocean.
In all of my almost 52 years, I’ve been
missing out on some truly wonderful treats.
Wanted: Many good people to counter cumulative
Sunday, June 10, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. — Though there is nothing in
his many speeches or writings to prove that these exact words
are his, the often-used quote above is largely attributed to
Burke (1729-1797) was an Ireland-born statesman,
author, orator and political philosopher who, after moving to
England, was elected to the House of Commons in the British
According to some information found on the Internet,
the quote familiar to so many of us is a summary of sorts to
something Burke said during a speech he made to the House of
Commons on April 23, 1770:
“When bad men combine, the good must associate;
else they will fall one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a
Regardless of the way the statement Burke
originally made evolved into the quote we know today, the truth
of it cannot be denied. The warning cannot be any more clear,
and neither can it be ignored.
From this vantage point, the once-great United
States of America is spiraling down toward mediocrity,
irrelevancy and even has-been status at an astonishing and
frightening pace — a pace that sometimes takes the breath
Though there are rays of hope, such as the
recent vote of confidence Republican Wisconsin Gov. Scott
Walker received in an election conjured up to recall him, each
day that goes by, government — government at all levels
and in all branches — chips away at our individual
liberties, saps away our economic resources and chomps away at
our once-strong moral foundation.
Our fallen warriors: Are their lives given or
Monday, June 4, 2012
By JACK MURPHY
In his remarks at Arlington National Cemetary on
Memorial Day 1982, President Reagan said, in part, “...
the silent testimony of those who gave their lives willingly
for their country.”
That choice of words has always seemed a “little
off” to me. I don’t mean to sound critical of
President Reagan, because I admired him greatly. This reference
to the deaths of the fallen in war is commonly used by many
writers and observers of conflict.
I have felt for some time that these heroes have not
really given their lives in the strict use of the word. No one
wants to give away his life. In certain circumstances, like
those who have covered the body of another with their own, or
thrown themselves on a hand grenade, it certainly would apply.
The person clearly knows the result of his action in these
cases. In most situations, though, members of a fighting force
are focussed on fighting the enemy, achieving victory, and
returning home to their families alive and well, as they
When a life is lost to an IED, a rocket burst or a
bullet, it might be more appropriate to say the life was taken
rather than given. This places more emphasis on the enemy, who
is fully responsible for the resulting death.
Our fighting men and women bravely place themselves in
danger from the evil forces that threaten their families and
other citizens. Saying that they go there “to give their
lives for their country” is not that flattering, in my
opinion. It gives the anti-war cynic an opening to inaccurately
portray what is happening here. Those who seek personal empowerment
by belittling those engaged in war can characterize it as throwing
away a precious gift casually.
Anyone who willingly acts to protect the helpless by
entering into a situation fraught with life-ending events
merely seconds away, during every moment of every day, is
certainly deserving to be called a hero. Even if his body
escapes physical harm externally, he returns home with a badly
I don’t want any young people going off to war
“to give their lives” for me. I want them to return
to their wives and children, mothers and fathers, sisters and
brothers. If some of them do not return, I want the record to
show clearly that their lives were taken from them by those
with evil in their hearts.
Jack Murphy of Maine is a winter resident of Frostproof,
Fla., and compiler of the “Styles of Smiles”
column that runs monthly in the News Chief newspaper in Winter
Haven. At this posting, he is back at his summertime home in
Maine and can be reached by e-mail at firstname.lastname@example.org.
If alcohol is involved, it’s not ‘‘family
Saturday, May 26, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. —— Well, this is disappointing.
The powers-that-be at Legoland Florida have asked for
and received from the Polk County Board of Adjustment
permission to sell alcoholic beverages.
So much for “family
The new theme park had sought an exemption from a
county code that bars the sale and consumption of alcohol
within 1,000 feet of a church or school. The exemption was
necessary because two churches are located nearby.
According to a newspaper report, Legoland
Florida General Manager Adrian Jones told the Board of
Adjustment on Thursday that the company eventually wants to be
able to sell beer and wine at a resort hotel planned for a
later phase of park development. But he also said a restaurant
in the new water park the attraction opened to the public today
(May 26) might soon sell beer and wine to adult guests.
Jones said hotel guests would expect to find
there a restaurant that serves alcohol, and he said park guests
have indicated in comments it was “almost expected”
that beer and wine would be sold at a water park.
And besides, park officials, the park’s
alcohol advocates and most members of the Board of Adjustment
say, all the other theme parks are selling alcohol.
Perhaps we should get comfort in knowing that
Legoland Florida isn’t seeking a state license to sell
distilled beverages. You know, hard liquor — vodka,
whiskey, rum and the like.
I’m not comforted by any kind of alcohol
being served at this “family” theme park, one at
which the target guests are children ages 2 through 12 and
their parents (and a business I really want to like for its
local economic benefits). And it seems quite contradictory that
a company that prides itself in providing wholesome
“family entertainment” would seek permission to
sell adult beverages, no matter how strong or light the alcohol
Family entertainment and alcohol are not
compatible. More than that, family and alcohol are not
compatible. I have some experience with that, having grown up
quite unpleasantly at times with parents and, briefly, a
stepfather who drank irresponsibly and often.
Unless the only interest is money, and the love
of it, nothing good in the long term comes from the sale and
consumption of alcohol — especially when children are
part of the mix.
Moral clarity? Don’t look for it in the
Thursday, May 10, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
HAVEN, Fla. — That big “SMOOOOOOCH!” you
heard Wednesday night was the collective lip-locking of gays
and lesbians all over the nation — perhaps all over the
world — as they celebrated President Barack Hussein
Obama’s new-found position on homosexual
president, a “committed Christian” as described by
his staff, now supports same-sex “marriage” after
not supporting it just a few years ago.
“At a certain point I’ve just concluded
that for me personally it is important for me to go ahead and
affirm that same-sex couples should be able to get
married,” the president said in a Wednesday interview
with ABC News.
only is Obama the first black U.S. president, he’s made
history again as the first U.S. president to openly support gay
That’s just so … so … progressive
of our esteemed and enlightened president. So forward-thinking,
the homosexuals say. And, according to some pundits, so very
bold and courageous of Obama — especially in an election
very, very wrong.
president’s statement on gay “marriage” was
set up unintentionally or intentionally — the latter
probably is more the truth, given the cold calculations of this
White House — by a comment Vice President Joe Biden made
over the weekend.
said on one of the news shows Sunday that he is
“absolutely comfortable” with same-sex
Obama’s team initially raced to distance the
president from Biden’s “personal” view,
saying the vice president’s comments did not reflect a
change in administration policy on the issue of gay
“marriage.” But then the president and his handlers
saw in some twisted way what they thought was a political
opportunity and seized upon it.
now-shared view by Obama and Biden on same-sex
“marriage” — “marriage” in this
context is in quotation marks because anything other than a
union of a man and woman is not marriage — really is not
a surprise, knowing the kind of anti-tradition, cross-cultural,
anti-social, anti-moral and un-American people that voters
ushered into high U.S. office four years ago. This issue is not
the reason to vote in new, better, stronger more moral
leadership this November, but it’s yet another reason to
do just that.
mistake, Obama and Biden are wrong in their support of same-sex
“marriage” because the basis for it, homosexual
behavior (a choice, not a predisposition), is wrong.
of God, natural order and just plain common sense tell us that
homosexuality is not natural and that gay
“marriage” makes no sense.
God, and we find that not only is homosexuality a sin, it is a
sin of the highest order — an abominable sin.
That’s not man, commentary writers or even
preachers talking; that’s God on high talking.
Obama, the “committed Christian,” and Biden, a
self-described Catholic Christian, would reach for their family
Bible, dust it off and turn to Leviticus in the Old Testament,
they will find these verses (God speaking through
Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is
abomination. — Leviticus 18:22
If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both
of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put
to death; their blood shall be upon them. — Leviticus
of creation, the God of the Bible, the God of righteousness and
justice and the Author of morality and salvation is supreme,
and His Word is the first and final authority on matters such
as this. But, it appears that our president and vice president,
after three and a half years in their lofty positions, think
they know better.
arrogance! What foolishness!
president said his new position on same-sex
“marriage” represents an “evolution” of
thought on the matter — from once opposing gay
“marriage” to now embracing it. More accurately, it
represents a further devolution of the American culture, a
further breakdown in societal structure and another giant crack
in the moral foundation of this once-great nation.
Don’t expect greatness from America and
don’t expect blessings from on high when we as a people
and the people who lead us don’t act with moral
From God’s perfect joke comes a pair of
Saturday, May 19, 2012
By JACK MURPHY
particular Friday night, after watching the 11 o’clock
news, I went to bed. As a man with apnea, I can’t sleep
on my back, so I habitually sleep on one side or the
night, I had trouble clearing my head of all my computer plans
and couldn’t get to sleep. After lying on one side for a
while, I felt the need to turn over. Often I play a sort of
game where I try to guess the time on the digital clock across
the room before I turn over. This time I closed my eyes and saw
12:15. When I turned over, there it was exactly — 12:15.
I was amazed and amused.
lying there a while longer, I again felt the need to turn over.
I closed my eyes and concentrated. I saw the red numerals,
12:35, as clear as anything. I turned over, and to my
amazement, the clock said exactly 12:35.
was really impressed!
the possible numbers I could have chosen, guessing these two
times with complete accuracy — right to the minute
— was far beyond the laws of chance. No way could this
have happened without some kind of spiritual
thought occurred to me that maybe it was possible that God was
planning to grant me some kind of special power to foretell
numerical choices. I thought how wonderful that would be and
actually spoke to God directly, asking for such a thing to take
place. I assured Him I would treat such a power with respect
and only use it for good.
tried to relax and go to sleep despite my excitement. Before
long, my shoulder felt a little stiff and I needed to turn over
again. This was it. This was the big one.
The lead image on the website of French
President-elect Franois Hollande has a simple message of
“Merci” — “Thank you” — to
the voters of France. The added inset images are the French
flag and the rose-adorned logo of the French Socialist
With election of a socialist, French say
‘Give us more’
Monday, May 7, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
HAVEN, Fla. — So, the French have elected a
socialist to be their president.
Franois Hollande, 57, a former Socialist party leader, will
be moving into lyse palace in Paris and single-term President
Nicolas Sarkozy will be moving out.
According to the news reports, Hollande will be the first
Socialist party member in 17 years to serve as French
president. Big “S” Socialist? Perhaps. But little
“s” socialist? No.
What the people of France actually did Sunday was elect as
their president someone who wears the “Socialist”
label on his sleeve rather than re-elect a socialist-light like
Given the political and social mind-set in France and its
deeply embedded big-government welfare and entitlement
programs, only a socialist to one degree or another will ever
be elected president over there.
A true conservative as defined in the United States —
someone who believes in capitalism, free markets, low corporate
and individual tax rates, personal liberty, individual
responsibility, a strong work ethic among the people, national
sovereignty and limited government — likely will never be
elected president of France.
Analysis of Sunday’s election indicates that in
electing Hollande, the French made Sarkozy another victim of
the anti-austerity wave that has swept Europe and swept out
leaders who have tried to undo some of the great economic
damage done by decades of socialist policies.
In rejecting “austerity”— in reality just
a minor rollback in government spending to help right their
nation’s sinking economic ship — the French have
re-embraced liberal spending policies. And they have embraced
Hollande, who has promised in many ways to give them just that.
That’s what a socialist does.
Laughingly, Hollande said during the presidential campaign
that he wants to promote “growth” alongside the
nation’s austerity drive. “Growth” in France
and in most of Western Europe means only one thing: Growth in
government spending on social and entitlement programs —
not economic growth. “Growth” in that sense and
“austerity” cannot co-exist.
The French didn’t do themselves any favors by electing
Hollande as their president, but, then again, the French
haven’t done much right since the nation backed the
American colonies in the Revolutionary War against Great
Since then, the French have become lazy, weak, unproductive,
selfish, self-absorbed and difficult-to-like whiners, content
to feed off whatever they can sap from their government and the
few economic producers their nation can muster.
But, perhaps that’s too harsh. Perhaps that’s
being way too tough on the French. Because what they did Sunday
wasn’t any different than what voters in this nation did
nearly four years ago — elect a socialist as
Back Romney for president and send Obama
Wednesday, May 2, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
HAVEN, Fla. — During the primary election season, I
wasn’t an enthusiastic supporter of any of the Republican
candidates for president. All of them fell far short of the
standard set by Ronald Reagan, by far the best conservative in
the modern era to ever run for and win the
that the path has been cleared for the 2012 GOP nomination of
Mitt Romney, I will back his candidacy for president and
enthusiastically vote for him come Nov. 6.
ask that my fellow conservatives and Republicans, and
independents, libertarians, conservative-to-moderate Democrats
and anyone else who truly loves our nation, to do the
should we support Romney with our time, energy, money, prayers
and, ultimately, our vote at the ballot box on Election
On most of the issues, particularly those dealing with the
economy and defense, he’s decidedly
Romney is a later-in-life politician, meaning he orginally made
a living outside of government as a highly successful
businessman. That experience in the real world can be and
should be extremely valuable when matters of the economy, job
creation and federal budget are considered.
His election should slow considerably the nation’s
dramatic lurch to the left and drive toward destructive
socialism, all led by the current administration of President
Barack Hussein Obama and — shedding some truth on the
matter — his Marxist/communist handlers.
Since his inauguration, Obama and his policies have been an
economic, financial, national security, social and cultural
disaster for the United States. An unrestrained Obama in a
second term very well could put the nation on an unrecoverable
path toward mediocrity or, even worse, eventual ruin. Why take
• Romney is a capitalist and not ashamed of it. He
understands full well that capitalism has been a crucial
component of this nation’s strong foundation through the
years and that capitalism will help keep the United States
economically strong, vibrant and free.
• I believe in and love America and, unlike the current
occupant of the White House, Romney also believes in America
— so much so that he’s made it his campaign
• Mitt Romney isn’t Barack Obama — the
point can’t be made strongly enough — so given the
choices we’ll have for president on the general election
ballot (and, to be sure, there will be plenty of fringe
candidate options for America’s top job), what reasonable
choice other than Romney do we have? (Not voting doesn’t
count and might even hurt the conservative cause.)
May God help us during this election cycle. May God be with
us. May God bless America.
On the Web: http://www.mittromney.com/
or tragically sad? This image, which is making the rounds on
Facebook, shows the politically, socially and culturally blind
being led off the cliff by President Barack Obama and those in
his administration. “Forward” is the new slogan for
the Obama re-election campaign. Interestingly, the slogan “Forward” has its roots in European
Marxism, according to people familiar with such things.
Coincidence? We think not.
Read his lips: ‘Fairness’ an Obama
call for tax hikes
Friday, May 4, 2012
By ROYAL A. BROWN III
HAVEN, Fla. — President Obama’s messages
about economic “fairness” are nothing more than
class warfare, pitting those considered to be rich against
those who pay no taxes.
His socialist policy of redistribution of wealth by
increasing taxes on the wealthy, using the proposed
“Buffett Rule” to increase capital gains taxes to
30 percent and marginal tax rates to 50 percent, will only
drive investments offshore and further reduce the number of
The Congressional Budget Office estimates that this will
result in only $500 billion being collected toward the $16
trillion (and growing) national debt over 10 years. Robbing
wealth from those who provide most of the jobs, while
destroying individual initiative and motivation to work hard,
is a very poor tradeoff.
Obama developed this new “fairness” message
because he can’t run on his record of failures, some of
which are listed below:
• Obamacare — A high costs to taxpayers, a
reduction in health care and unconstitutionality.
• No tax reform — Fifty percent of Americans pay
• No immigration reform — The federal government
is suing the states for enforcing federal laws that the federal
government won’t even enforce.
• No energy policy — Wasting taxpayer funds on
“green” projects that supply less than 2 percent of
our energy needs and lying about who increased domestic oil
production and drilling.
• An apologetic and appeasement foreign policy —
Leading to the “Arab Spring” and more radical
• Government regulation — Unconstitutional
federal czars and executive orders replacing leadership.
• Disregard for the U.S. Constitution and individual
liberty — Example: Ordering Catholic institutions to
• Poor economy — Unemployment still more than 8
percent unemployment (17 percent underemployment);
foreclosures; allowing two years of unemployment pay.
• Transparency in government — Not.
• Debt — Increases of $5 trillion and growing; a
budget plan with a $1.3 trillion deficit; the use of military
assets to support vacations and junkets; no entitlement
• Fostering a European-style entitlement society
— A record 44 million people on food stamps and increases
in other government giveaways (cell phones, housing subsidies,
Medicaid, Social Security Supplemental Security Income [SSI],
• Attempts to reduce our national sovereignty through
the United Nations.
• Irresponsible actions by the U.S. attorney general
— The “Operation Fast and Furious” weapons
sting; Black Panthers; and the use of the United Nations to
declare that the United States violates human rights.
Royal A. Brown III is a retired career U.S. Army veteran
and a retired educator. He taught in the Army Junior ROTC
program at Winter Haven (Fla.) High School.
Many in government want control over our private
pension and retirement funds and our free Internet. Are we
going to let them have it?
Be wary of government’s moves on
Thursday, April 26, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
HAVEN, Fla. — Words to the wise:
They’ve already come for, taken and corrupted
most of our children through a public education system —
grade school, secondary and post-secondary — that long
ago kicked out God, the Bible, discipline and sound
higher-ups in our “benevolent” federal government
are gunning for our Internet-related freedoms and our privately
held pension and retirement funds.
Don’t let them have them. Don’t let them
government moves in on the Internet — the World Wide Web
— not only will it grab the ability to tax financial
transactions currently out of its reach, it will control the
individual’s ability to freely post content to the
’Net and, as a result, limit the rich content — be
it good, bad or ugly — that all of us are now free to
view, research, download and interact with.
and quite scary terms, the government would end up controlling
both the medium and the message.
Two of our presidents: Abraham Lincoln, No. 16, left,
and Barack Hussein Obama, No. 44. Given a choice, who would you
trust most to steer the ship of state?
Obama like Lincoln? Let’s paint a picture of
April 21 , 2012
By JOE BRADDY
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. — The television news had a
blip the other night about our nation’s 44th president,
Barack Hussein Obama, and yet another in a long line of
references he has made through the years to our 16th president,
This time, apparently, President Obama was drawing
similarities between himself and Lincoln.
(It wasn’t the first time he’s done this. Back
in mid-March, our Democrat president said that he’s more
like Lincoln, the nation’s first Republican president, than any
of today’s crop of Republicans. And he suggested that
Lincoln would feel more at home with today’s Democrat
Party than with the modern-day GOP.)
Without even trying to understand the
president’s logic or reasoning for making the comparison,
except to say the self-absorbed one likely has motives tied to
a re-election bid, it might be more instructive to note the
striking contrasts between him and Lincoln.
To the atheist: Just look
to nature, to the heavens
April 24, 2012
By JAMES W. MacMEEKIN III
WINTER HAVEN, Fla.— Atheism is a religion to the same degree as
all other faiths. Webster’s Dictionary describes atheism
Atheists are free to practice their religious beliefs, but they
certainly are not free to impede or prohibit the free
exercise for those who have a different belief.
This commentary will neither ridicule nor proselytize, but it
does provide a metaphoric discussion for consideration by both
those of “faith” and those who believe in the
religion of atheism.
Nov. 6, 2012, a pivotal date for the future of our
Thursday, March 29, 2012
By PIXIE RUBIN
AUBURNDALE, Fla. — It is evident from watching
the Republican presidential debates and the fight for the GOP
presidential nomination that many people do not understand the
significance of the upcoming presidential election. Issues such
as gay rights, a candidate’s faith and alleged personal
baggage are irrelevant to the greater issue.
The presidential election of Nov. 6, 2012, will
present a choice between freedom and socialism. We are now at
the point where the nation’s survival as a prosperous
society will be decided. If we turn right, back toward this
nation’s founding principles, we have an opportunity to
remain free and restore this country to its former greatness.
If we continue to move left, toward the European socialist
model, we might lose our freedoms in this country
We are 10 years behind Europe’s example of what
our future will look like if President Barack Obama is
re-elected: Austerity measures and rioting in the streets by
those whose attitude is, “You owe me.” Think
Wisconsin and the state union members’ outrage at being
asked to contribute to their own pension plans.
Before I kick the bucket, I have a list to
Saturday, April 7, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. — As a
journalist/editor/writer, I deal daily with words and phrases
— let’s call it the language — and have been
doing that for almost 37 years. It might be a surprise,
however, to learn that the term “bucket list” was
only vaguely familiar to me up until a couple of years
That’s when I watched on the small screen a
tearjerker of a movie starring Jack Nicholson and Morgan
Freeman and titled — Guess what? — “The
Bucket List.” It’s about a couple of terminally
ill, cranky and seemingly incompatible old guys who befriend
one another and decide together to do a few things — some
of them wild — before they “kick the bucket.”
Hence, the Nicholson and Freeman characters create their mutual
bucket list and cross off the line items as they do them
— and have a blast along the way.
I’ve started a bucket list, too, though at last
check my life was terminal in only the normal and basically
healthy kind of way. At this stage, I don’t have on my
list any of the more daring kinds of things the Nicholson and
Freeman characters did (While it might be a rush, I doubt that
my limits for adventure will have me parachuting out of an
airplane.), but I do consider my list to be reasonably
challenging, especially with time and money being key
The Quran of Islam
is a dangerous book
Saturday, March 17, 2012
By JACK MURPHY
FROSTPROOF, Fla. — I originally wrote this in
response to an article that listed only positive statements
from the Quran (or Koran), the guiding book of Islam. The
article described 10 positive statements made by Muhammad, the
founder of Islam. Those statements, according to the writer,
show the commonalities among Islam, Christianity and
The writer avoided the Quran’s contrary
The Quran, quite frankly, is a very dangerous book.
Despite many positive religious instructions, it contains many
that validate the actions of terrorists around the world, and
it degrades women.
Since the Quran uses the same chapter-and-verse format
as the Bible, I will include the same style to support my
statements. Readers can verify them in the Qurans found in any
library. Or, you can download your own copy free of charge.
There are many free sources on the Internet. I downloaded my
first copy from the Gutenberg site that has thousands of free
books for downloading. The translator of my copy was J.M.
Rodwell, a minister as I recall.
In the Quran: “We send not a prophet with
miracles, but to strike terror” 17:59; defines infidels:
“who say Jesus is a messiah” 5:17; slay infidels:
“strike off their heads …” 47:4-6.
The Quran teaches male superiority, 4:34 and 2:228;
women have only a half vote before a jury, 2:282; instructions
for scourging one’s wife, 4:34; wives may only inherit
half of what males may inherit; authorizes polygamy, 4:3;
validates slavery, 33:50; permission given for sex with any
owned slaves, 4:24.
The Quran teaches religious intolerance: Only Muslims
enter Heaven, 3:85; Muslims forbidden from taking Jews or
Christians as friends, 5:51; lying is permissible to
one’s enemies, 24:11.
Many “perpetual” virgins (They will become
“freshened” to virginity continually) await Muslims
in Heaven; 56:35; wine, forbidden on Earth, will be abundant in
Heaven, 47:16 and 82:25; and it will never make one drunk,
37:45. The story of 72 virgins is not true precisely. The
number was added by Muhammad’s followers later. The Quran
does describe “wide-eyed” maidens for their
pleasure. If boys are preferred, they will be provided. I
swear, this is true.
These things are not in my Bible. Are they in yours?
Jack Murphy of Maine is a winter resident of
Frostproof, Fla. He can be reached by e-mail at
Targeting oil ‘speculators’ an
energy policy sideshow
March 5, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. — Bill Nelson is the perfect
example of the politician who will attempt to score some quick
and easy election-year points by pushing frivolous and gimmicky
“solutions” to very real and very serious national
In a recent e-mail blast, Florida’s senior U.S.
senator reminded us of the painful reality of rising fuel
prices and news reports that a gallon of gasoline could cost
motorists $5 or more by summertime.
“That’s outrageous — and
unjustified,” Nelson the Democrat wrote in dramatic
But in the balance of his message, Nelson didn’t
direct his fury against an abominable U.S. energy policy that
stifles domestic oil production. He didn’t rant against
national leaders who scorn “Big Oil” and hold oil
companies up to public ridicule. He didn’t boldly take on
the environmentalists and “global-warming”
alarmists and truthfully tell about their role in making
America a nation too dependent on foreign energy sources and
weak in the process.
We wouldn’t really expect that of a senator with
liberal leanings, would we? That’s not in their
No, Nelson’s “fix” for high fuel
prices is proposed legislation that targets the new energy
bogeyman: The oil “speculator.”
Following recent events, will Susan G. Komen for the
Cure and Planned Parenthood be forever linked in our
Komen group came so close to doing the right
Feb. 4, 2012
By JOE BRADDY
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. — I had plans Friday
to write a piece about the Susan G. Komen for the Cure
foundation and how pleased I was to learn that the
nation’s leading breast cancer charity had severed
financial ties with Planned Parenthood.
I’m glad I didn’t. A follow-up would’ve
This morning I read that the Komen foundation leaders, under
intense criticism and pressure from social media and other
corners, had reversed course. The foundation will continue to
provide grant money to the abortion-providing Planned
Parenthood, supposedly for its breast cancer-screening
Not only has my pleasure with the Komen foundation turned to
displeasure, I am truly disappointed and disheartened that its
leaders, fearing loss of the almighty funding dollar, succumbed
under Planned Parenthood-led pressure to retain the
foundation’s original grant rules. Those rules flow allow
the flow of foundation money to Planned Parenthood, while the
grant rule changes announced earlier in the week would’ve
cut off that flow.
In essence, the Komen foundation leaders took what amounted
to be a highly moral stance toward its relationship with
Planned Parenthood and then retreated, coming down squarely on
the side of mammon — the pursuit and love of money.
season and presidential politics combine to fire up the debate
about the U.S. tax code and options for replacing it.
Scrap the tax code; ponder move to national
Tuesday, Feb. 7, 2012
By JAMES W. MacMEEKIN III
HAVEN, Fla. — Reducing the federal budget to
meaningful programs is only one of the many chores
required of a U.S House and a Senate that, conservatives hope,
both will be controlled by Republicans following the Nov. 6
Confronting the Internal Revenue Service — and
its 40,000-plus pages of rules and regulations — will
test the political fortitude of the newly elected. But, it must
Department of the Treasury employs about 150,000 individuals,
including the new 16,000-member IRS audit force, which will
cling to their leader’s economically disastrous tax
agenda to the ruination of any return to full employment.
must be virtually eliminated. The income tax must be
Weight loss possible when exercising some
Saturday Dec. 31, 2011
By JOE BRADDY
“17 USED TREADMILLS”
That’s the message I saw on a sign outside a
used sporting goods store I drove by in Winter Haven a couple
of weeks before Christmas.
Motorists passing my truck at the time might have seen
the wry smile that came to my face.
“Now, that says a lot,” I
me that the store likely paid almost nothing for, and probably
was asking top dollar for, several treadmills that people
wasted their money on and wanted to get out of the
me that the store was taking advantage of the holiday buying
and gift-giving season to help ring up some sales — not
that there’s anything wrong with that.
me that the store also was timing the treadmill sales to the
coming new year and the penchant among many people to resolve
to lose weight and get fit.
told me that at least 17 people in the area likely gave up on
their resolution and didn’t want to have a treadmill
around the house to remind them about it.
many more people are there who gave up on their fitness
resolution but still have a treadmill or some other large piece
of exercise equipment taking up space in the family room or
I’m here to say that anybody — anybody
— can lose weight and get fit and that nobody —
absolutely nobody — needs to waste hard-earned money on
expensive exercise equipment to do it. (Sorry, manufacturers
The irony of it all
piece of art, created in the wake of the recent protests
against corporate America and Wall Street, is making the rounds
on the Internet. It shows well the irony of the protests and
the hypocrisy — idiocy? — of most of those doing
the protesting. You can go here for a larger version of this
Barack Hussein Obama is the president of the United States, but
can Americans trust this man to keep the nation strong, well
defended and free? (U.S. government photos)
On cue, ‘Obamaspeak’ follows
failure of budget ‘Super
Sunday, Nov. 27, 2011
By JAMES W. MacMEEKIN III
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. — Recently, President Barack
Hussein Obama proposed a “Super Committee” to
provide the nation that which Congress could not. Namely, a
federal budget that would simultaneously reduce America’s $15
trillion indebtedness while continuing the expansion of Barack
Hussein’s entitlement programs.
By definition, there could be no budget acceptable to
both the Sociocoms (aka “Democrats”) and alleged
conservatives (aka “Republicans”). There should be
no surprise at this ideological impasse. It came off as planned
by the Sociocoms.
How’s that again?
What’s the truth about Social Security? Is it a
Ponzi scheme or is it a perpetually viable and dependable
financial safety net for older Americans? (Illustration by Joe
Social Security (1935-2011): Where is the
Saturday, Oct. 8, 2011
By JAMES W. MacMEEKIN III
WINTER HAVEN, Fla. — Recently, there has been
some controversy regarding the administration of Social
Security. One Republican presidential candidate had the
audacity to suggest it was a Ponzi scheme. Another Republican
presidential candidate suggested otherwise.
Let history be your guide. Since 1935, when President
Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the Social Security Act into law,
the trillions of working-men and women dollars, placed in trust
for their eventual retirement have, indeed, been faithfully
doled out to retiring workers.
For several decades, more dollars flowed into Social
Security than required for disbursement. Naturally, our elected
officials (aka “politicians”) couldn’t help
but notice the mounting pile of (formerly) silver certificates.
They were fast to take advantage. Rather than expose these
silver certificates to the vagaries of the (gasp!) stock
market, where, from one day to the next, who knew what fate
awaited the innocent!
watching this space and see the bird as it takes on new
personalities in a series drawn by James W. MacMeekin III.
(Exclusive rights are granted to PolkCommentary.com for
publication of this cartoon series. No other publication is
permitted without the written consent of the artist.)
Blessed is the man that endureth temptation: for when he is tried, he shall receive the crown of life, which the Lord hath promised to them that love him. — James 1:12 (KJV)
“When you accept the fact that sometimes seasons are dry and times are hard and that God is in control of both, you will discover a sense of divine refuge, because the hope then is in God and not in yourself.” — Charles R. Swindoll, evangelical Christian pastor, author and educator
“My patriotic heart beats red, white and blue.” — Author unknown
“I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have.” — Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), principal author of the Declaration of Independence and third president of the United States
“In America, we celebrate success. We don’t apologize for success.” — Mitt Romney, Republican presidential nominee, in Aug. 30, 2012, nomination acceptance speech
“Whatever we worship, short of God, is sure to be our undoing.” — Mignon McLaughlin in The Neurotic’s Notebook (1960)
“Don’t go around saying the world owes you a living. The world owes you nothing. It was here first.” — Mark Twain, American novelist (1835-1910)
“The difference between ordinary and extraordinary is that little extra.” — Jimmy Johnson, Super Bowl-winning former NFL coach
“There are no easy answers, but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” —
Ronald Reagan (1911-2004), 40th president of the United States
“Enslave the liberty of but one human being and
the liberties of the world are put in peril.” —
William Lloyd Garrison (1805-1879), American
abolitionist, journalist and social reformer
An excerpt from remarks by President Ronald
Reagan during Memorial Day ceremonies at Arlington National
Cemetery, May 31, 1982:
... I have no illusions about what little I can add now to the
silent testimony of those who gave their lives willingly for
their country. Words are even more feeble on this Memorial Day,
for the sight before us is that of a strong and good nation
that stands in silence and remembers those who were loved and
who, in return, loved their countrymen enough to die for
“Yet, we must try to honor them — not for
their sakes alone, but for our own. And if words cannot repay
the debt we owe these men, surely with our actions we must
strive to keep faith with them and with the vision that led
them to battle and to final sacrifice.
“Our first obligation to them and ourselves is
plain enough: The United States and the freedom for which it
stands, the freedom for which they died, must endure and
prosper. Their lives remind us that freedom is not bought
cheaply. It has a cost; it imposes a burden. And just as they
whom we commemorate were willing to sacrifice, so too must we
— in a less final, less heroic way — be willing to
give of ourselves. ...”
“Knowing is not enough; we must apply. Willing
is not enough; we must do.” — Johann Wolfgang von
Goethe (1749-1832), German writer, pictorial artist,
biologist and theoretical physicist
“The moral imaginations of Americans, which is
so much a part of our national character, is inseparable from
our religious roots.” — Paul
Greenberg (1937-), columnist and political
“To preserve liberty, it is essential that the
whole body of people always possess arms, and be taught alike,
especially when young, how to use them.” —
Richard Henry Lee (1732-1794), American
statesman from Virginia and signatory to the U.S. Declaration
“There is nothing wrong with America that the
faith, love of freedom, intelligence and energy of her citizens
cannot cure.” — Dwight D.
Eisenhower (1890-1969), American World War II hero and
34th president of the United States
pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America,
and to the Republic for which it stands. One nation under God,
indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.” —
The Pledge of Allegiance
bend in the road is not the end of the road ... unless you fail
to make the turn.” — Anonymous
“Firearms are second only to the Constitution in
importance; they are the peoples’ liberty’s
teeth.” — George Washington
(1732-1799), Revolutionary War hero and first U.S.
believe with all my heart that one cannot be America’s
president without a belief in God, without the strength that
your faith gives you.” — George H.W.
Bush (born 1924), 41st U.S. president
“Take the first step in faith. You don’t
have to see the whole staircase, just take the first
step.” — Dr. Martin Luther King
Jr. (1929-1968), American civil rights
“Democracy is worth dying for, because
it’s the most deeply honorable form of government ever
devised by man.” — Ronald Reagan
(1911-2004), 40th U.S. president
“My God! How little do my countrymen know what
precious blessings they are in possession of, and which no
other people on Earth enjoy!” — Thomas
Jefferson (1743-1826), author of the Declaration of
Independence and third U.S. president
“It’s never too late to be what you might
have been.” — Mary Ann Evans, aka George
Eliot (1819-1880), British novelist
only regret that I have but one life to lose for my
country.” — The final words of Revolutionary War
hero Nathan Hale before he was hanged by the
British on Sept. 22, 1776
“It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do
not care who gets the credit.” — Harry S.
Truman (1884-1982), 33rd U.S. president
be to God for his unspeakable gift. — 2
Corinthians 9:15 (KJV)
pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist
sees the opportunity in every difficulty.” —
Winston Churchill, former prime minister of
“Try not to become a man of success but a man of
value.” —Albert Einstein,
mathematician and physicist
“America will never seek a permission slip to
defend the security of our people.” —
George W. Bush, 43rd U.S. president
“Work spares us from three evils: Boredom, vice
and need.” —Voltaire
“The strength of our country is the strength of its religious convictions.” —
Calvin Coolidge (1872-1933), 30th president of the United States
“Make use of time. Let not advantage slip.” —
William Shakespeare (1554-1616), English poet, dramatist and actor
“A thorough knowledge of the Bible is worth more than a college education.” —
Theodore Roosevelt (1858-1919), 26th president of the United States
“It is incredible how as soon as a people
becomes subject, it promptly falls into such complete forgetfulness
of its freedom that it can hardly be roused to the point of
regaining it, obeying so easily and so willingly that one is
led to say, on beholding such a situation, that this people
has not so much lost its liberty as won its enslavement. —
From the “Discourse on Voluntary Servitude”
(1548) by French political philosopher tienne de La
“The problem with socialism is that eventually
you run out of other people’s money.” —
Margaret Thatcher (1925-), conservative
British politician and first woman to serve as British prime
“Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the
gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and
many there be which go in thereat: ...” — Matthew
7:13 (the words of Jesus Christ in the Sermon
on the Mount)
“Life is a long lesson in humility.”
— James Matthew Barrie (1860-1937),
Scottish novelist and dramatist and creator of Peter
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.”
— Written by U.S. Rep. Ron Paul,
R-Texas, a 2008 and 2012 candidate for the Republican
presidential nomination, in his book, “The Revolution: A
“The wisdom of life consists in the elimination
of nonessentials.” — Author Lin Yutang
in “An Academic Sparks Giving to
a child in the way he should go; and when he is old, he will
not depart from it. — Proverbs 22:6 (KJV)
“Integrity has no need of rules.” —
Albert Camus (1913-1960), French author,
philosopher, journalist and Nobel Prize winner for
“The price of greatness is
responsibility.” — Sir Winston
Churchill (1874-1965), British statesman and prime
“Many Christians have gone on to an untimely
death because they got out of the will of God.” —
Dr. Gene Wiggins, pastor, Central Baptist
Church, Winter Haven, Fla., in a March 4, 2012, sermon
the Bible ... “In regard to this great Book, I have but
to say, it is the best gift God has given to men. All the good
Saviour gave to the world was communicated through this Book.
But for it we could not know right from wrong. All things most
desirable for man’s welfare, here and hereafter, are to
found portrayed in it.” — Abraham
Lincoln (1809-1865), 16th president of the United
“The love of wealth makes bitter men; the love
of God, better men.” — W.L.
“The reason Christianity is the best friend of
government is because Christianity is the only religion that
changes the heart.” — Thomas Jefferson
(1743-1826), author of the Declaration of Independence
and third U.S. president
nation or civilization that continues to produce soft-minded
men purchases its own spiritual death on the installment plan.
— Martin Luther King Jr. (1929-1968),
U.S. civil rights leader
“America will never be destroyed from the
outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because
we destroyed ourselves.” — Abraham
Lincoln, 16th president of the United States
“The higher our position, the more modestly we
should behave.” — Marcus Tullius
Cicero (106 B.C.-43 B.C.), Roman philosopher,
Righteousness exalteth a nation, but sin is a reproach
to any people. — Proverbs 14:34 (KJV)
“Lost time is never found again.”
Benjamin Franklin, American patriot, statesman
I read that one of the presidential debates will have a town-hall format where citizens will ask the candidates questions. The most common question: “Are you the only two choices?” —
From Late Night With Jimmy Fallon
I hit a rabbit with my car last night. He was very unhoppy.
Love is ... Love is the thing that enables a woman to sing while she mops up the floor after her husband has walked across it in his barn boots. —
Contributed by Jack Murphy
Man: “So, do you want to go out,
maybe?” Woman: “Sorry. I don’t date outside
What’s the world’s most popular wine?
“I don’t like Brussels sprouts.”
A gossip is someone with a great sense of
smuggle cars into the country, are you trafficking? —
Contributed by Jack Murphy
I started out with nothing and still have most
of it left.
is the U.S. economy? Jury duty is now considered to be a
Artificial intelligence usually beats real
Grant me the senility to forget the people I never liked; the
good fortune to run into the ones I do; and the eyesight to
tell the difference. — Contributed by Jack
Did you hear about the red ship and the blue ship that
collided? Both crews were marooned.
think nobody cares if you’re alive, try missing a couple
A laugh for dieter No. 1: Losing weight is a
triumph of mind over platter.
in my own little world, but it’s OK; they know me
Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit.
Wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad.
Sometimes I wake up grumpy. Other times I let her
I didn’t fight my way to the top of the
food chain to be a vegetarian.
peanuts were walking down the road and one was a
Oh, for the good old days when people would
stop Christmas shopping when they ran out of money. —
Anonymous, but contributed by Jack Murphy
“If you had to specify, in one word, why the
human race has not, and will never achieve its full potential,
that word would be meetings.” — Dave
A retired husband is often a wife’s
I’ve got to get in shape. Yesterday my
imagination ran wild, and today my arms and legs are sore.
— From the collection of Jack
Did you hear about the two radio antennas that
got married? The wedding was terrible, but the reception was
IRS might be targeting Tea Party
headline doesn’t give us a warm and fuzzy feeling about
our federal government:
“Numerous Tea Party chapters claim IRS
attempts to sabotage nonprofit status”
According to the report (read it here) by Perry Chiaramonte of Fox News,
“Tea Party chapters around the nation are blasting the
Internal Revenue Service after the federal agency sent them
letters demanding information about their politics,
contributors and even family members.”
government, conceived more than 200 years ago on the premise
that everyone has the right to “life, liberty and the
pursuit of happiness,” has gotten to be too big, too
intrusive, too overbearing, too coercive and, increasingly, too
too late to dial back the size and reach of the federal
government? I hope not. — Joe Braddy (March 4,
Post-rapture Earth won’t be
lately that the words that disturb us the most are found on
stickers on vehicle rear windows or back bumpers.
Recently, this space addressed a bumper sticker that
said: “Instead of being born again, why not just grow
Here’s what was found Feb. 17 on a car being
driven by someone with obvious anti-Christian
“Bring on the rapture. The rest of us will have
the Earth to ourselves.”
person with the sticker, and those who find it amusing, have no
comprehension of what the rapture is and the terrible events it
brief and to be clear, post rapture, Earth will not be a
pleasant place. No, it will be an awful place.
the word “rapture” isn’t in the Bible, it
conveys the biblical teaching that at some point, perhaps soon,
Jesus Christ will call the living Christians — and the
dead in Christ — out of this world to meet him in the air
and be taken away to Heaven. The Holy Spirit’s influence
in the world will be removed as well. And afterward will come
seven years of “tribulation,” a word that
is found in the Bible. God will judge the world and
those who have rejected His offer of salvation.
who would want to be left behind to live in a world void of the
evil-restraining influence of Christians and the Holy
Apparently, the answer is those who would adorn their
vehicles with bumper stickers that mock the rapture and, in
essense, mock God. — Joe Braddy (Feb. 19,
It’s all God’s handiwork
very much rising early, going outside, praying, meditating and
soaking in the freshness of a new day.
morning, as I looked east and watched whispy white clouds go
from pink to orange with the rising sun, a belief I’ve
had since childhood was reinforced — again.
There’s absolutely no way the wonder, beauty,
perfection, greatness and majesty of Earth’s nature and
the universe came about by accident, a “Big Bang”
the eggheads call it.
as it says in the Bible, in Genesis 1:1, “In the
beginning, God created the heaven and the
About that I can be certain — even without a degree in
science. — JB (April 10, 2012)
The message is challenging
by my church Saturday while running some errands and saw the
new sign message that someone had put up:
“Will anyone be in Heaven because of
It’s a challenging message for all Christians
— me included.— JB
(March 25, 2012)
The stars are
by accident tonight, I stumbled across the big, bright and
knew they were up there in the heavens, hung perfectly by God
in His glorious creation, but tonight they seemed extra
change of routine, I went outside around 7:30 p.m. to cool down
in the cool night air following a round of exercises, and when
I looked out and up, there they were. Those stars.
because the light of the moon wasn’t around to interfere,
and the sky was so clear, the stars seemed to be extra bright.
And extra big. And extra beautiful.
thankful for the stars — and the little time I could
spend with them tonight. — JB (Jan. 16,
the holidays , I heard for the first time a song that hints of
a Christmas message but clearly delivers a gospel
two talented ladies at our church, “Immanuel” was
made popular by the contemporary Christian trio Point of
“Immanuel, our God is with us, yes he is with us
still. Immanuel, he has not left us, and he never
course, Immanuel (or Emmanuel) means “God with us”
and is another name for Jesus Christ.
up references to the song, I came across a performance of it by
Point of Grace on YouTube. You can find it — and, I hope,
enjoy it — here. — JB
“His strength is perfect when our strength is gone.
He’ll carry us when we can’t carry on.”
— From “His Strength Is Perfect,” a song by
Steven Curtis Chapman
“He was there all the time ... waiting patiently in
line.” – From “He Was There All the
Time,” a contemporary Christian song
“In times like these I have a Savior, In times
like these I have an anchor; ...” — From “In
Times Like These,” a gospel hymn